Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Paramount Tax & Accounting logo

Paramount Tax & Accounting Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Financial ServicesUTFranchising since 2018
AStrongest tierStrongest tier89/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$74K – $166K
Disclosed sales
$498K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01886FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent100%
Manager-run OKYes: Exclusive territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Paramount Tax & Accounting is a franchise providing tax preparation, bookkeeping, and accounting services for individuals and small businesses. Franchisees run a local practice managing client returns, books, and advisory work.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Paramount Tax & Accounting franchise requires a total initial investment of $74K – $166K, including a $40K franchise fee and an ongoing 10.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $498K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$74K – $166K
59th pct Financial Ser…
Avg gross sales
$498K
18th pct Financial Ser…
Royalty
10.0%
18th pct Financial Ser…
Units
92
48th pct Financial Ser…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Financial Services · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$74K – $166K
Median $94K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$40K – $40K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$10K – $46K
Median $10K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$498K
Median $262K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
10.0%
Median 10.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
10.0% of rev
Median 16.5%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
92 units
Median 50 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
3.3%
Median 5.0%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
Exclusive
No other outlet of the brand may open inside it
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Financial Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $74K – $166K including a $40K franchise fee, 10.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $498K/year (median $204K), with an estimated 177% cash-on-cash return.
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 89/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +12 franchised outlets in the latest year (15 opened, 3 closed); 7 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 76.5% CAGR over 3 years with 92 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Paramount Franchising LLC
Parent company
Paramount Tax & Accounting CPAS PLLC
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
Paramount Franchising, LLC (Florida LLC, dissolved)
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
CEO, CFO and Chief Franchise Development Officer
Jon Wilhelm
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
NV
HQ
12481 South Fort St., Suite 200, Draper, Utah 84020
Auditor
Kezos & Dunlavy
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$1.9M
vs $2.0M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Affiliated brands

  • company that we form

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
Jon Wilhelm
Headquarters
UT
Founded
2016
FDD year
2025
States available
21

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 28% above the typical financial services franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$74K – $166KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 19 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$40,000Verified — printed on page 12 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty10.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 14 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fundNot extracted
Working capital$10K – $46K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown16 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee$40K$40K
Real Estate / Rent$0$12K
Utilities$0$3K
Leasehold Improvementsnot refundable$0$10K
Initial Marketingnot refundable$0$5K
Startup Packagenot refundable$20K$25K
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipmentnot refundable$0$5K
Insurancenot refundable$500$4K
Signagenot refundable$300$3K
Office Expensesnot refundable$0$2K
Supply Inventorynot refundable$100$2K
Licenses and Permitsnot refundable$0$1K
Dues and Subscriptionsnot refundable$700$2K
Professional Feesnot refundable$0$3K
Travel, Lodging and Meals for Initial Trainingnot refundable$3K$4K
Additional Funds (first 3 months)not refundable$10K$46K
Total initial investment$74K$166K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$74K – $166K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$10K – $46K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$40K – $40K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
10.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
-n/d
Total fee load
10.0%
vs 9–13% typical
Payback period
0.6 yrs
From FDD / Item 19

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Paramount Tax & Accounting: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty10.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$300
Training fee$2K
Transfer fee$20K
Renewal fee$0
Inventory (initial)$100 – $2K
Total fee load10.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 90% above the financial services norm.

Avg gross sales$498KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 51 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$204KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 51 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales and net income
Sample size30 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Paramount Tax & Accounting until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$148K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

FDD-reported earnings

The FDD reports $213K as Net Income. This is a disclosed figure, not our estimate — we publish no modelled profit for Paramount Tax & Accounting.

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Paramount Tax & Accounting unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $497,814 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $74K–$166K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $10K–$46K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$148K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$498K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$204K
Avg net income
$213K
Cash-on-cash
177.2%
Based on Net Income / investment midpoint

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales and net income
Sample size
30 outlets
vs category median 94 · small
Range (low → high)
$57K→$3.3MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 51 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
7 / 10
vs category median 0 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank18th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank59th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank18th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank48th
vs Financial Services peers
Risk score rank2th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 45 Financial Services brands

Showing the headline figures — all 157 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is 4.1x the investment midpoint. At typical franchise margins, this suggests a payback under 3 years.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $498K/year in gross sales. Median is $204K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 4.1x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 10.0% — below the Financial Services median of 16.5%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 7/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 76.5% CAGR over 3 years across 92 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Financial Services medians

How Paramount Tax & Accounting Compares

Metric
Paramount Tax & Accounting
Category median
vs median
Investment
$120K
$94Kmiddle half $70K–$116K · n=38
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$498K
$262Kmiddle half $115K–$322K · n=9
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
92
50middle half 14–241 · n=38
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Financial Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units92Verified — printed on page 52 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+76.5% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate3.3% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
92
Opened
15
Last reporting year
Closed
3
Terminated
3
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
3.3%
Company-owned
2
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
98%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+76.5%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+76.5%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
3
Not renewed
0
Transferred
1
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
7
0.08 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
7
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Termination rate
3.3%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
3.3%
Units that stopped operating
2022
51
Franchised units
2023
78+27
Franchised units
2024
90+12
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 17 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 17 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Maryland
  • Michigan
  • Washington
  • Wisconsin

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

56 current owners across 17 states; 1 former (terminated, transferred or not renewed) listed separately.

  • TX 14
  • CA 11
  • FL 6
  • ID 4
  • KS 3
  • AZ 2
  • CO 2
  • MD 2
  • NC 2
  • NV 2
  • UT 2
  • CT 1
  • +5 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

Growth insight

Fast growth in a small system. Newer franchisors expanding quickly may not yet have the support infrastructure of larger systems.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score89/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier89Verdict score 89/100

Moderate-to-caution risk profile: regulatory compliance issues, unverified financial claims, and high royalty drag on profitability warrant deep validation with current franchisees.

Moderate confidence±13 pts
76100

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

1 case: Administrative Proceeding before the Securities Commissioner of Maryland (Case No. 2023-0005). Consent order for sale of franchise when Maryland registration had expired. Franchisee offered rescission but elected to remain.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Kezos & Dunlavy

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $1.9MYr 2: $2.0MNon-royalty: $0.1M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

FY2024 audited (Paramount Franchising, LLC). Total operating revenues $1,892,016 = initial franchise fees $250,000 + royalty fees $1,498,964 + fulfillment fees $143,052. Net income $513,288. other_revenue reflects fulfillment fees line.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 89 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDRegulatory violation: Maryland Securities Commissioner consent order (Feb 2023) for operating with expired franchise registration—indicates compliance gaps
  2. 02MINORHigh royalty burden: 10% on gross sales reduces net margins; at $497K avg revenue, that's ~$49.7K annually in royalties, impacting the $212.7K net income significantly
  3. 03MEDModest unit growth: 15.4% YoY growth is healthy but small system (92 units) provides limited peer network and economies of scale
  4. 04MEDHigh initial investment-to-fee ratio: $40K franchise fee represents 54-77% of total startup cost; limited financial cushion for working capital or underperformance period

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 157 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 10.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term20 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryExclusive (favorable vs category)
Initial training42 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term20 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeExclusive territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹYes
Territory population100,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ25 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationSalt Lake County, Utah
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawUT
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

1 case: Administrative Proceeding before the Securities Commissioner of Maryland (Case No. 2023-0005). Consent order for sale of franchise when Maryland registration had expired. Franchisee offered rescission but elected to remain.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
16 hrs
On-the-job training
26 hrs
Training location
Salt Lake County, Utah or virtual video conference
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
1 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee (with franchisor approval)
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Drake Software (tax preparation); QuickBooks Online (accounting)
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✗Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Drake Software (tax preparation); QuickBooks Online (accounting)

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

57 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 57 contacts · $49
Free preview
(650) 759-••••CA
Unlock all 57 contacts
(858) 299-••••CA
(913) 413-••••KS
(832) 282-••••TX
(480) 204-••••AZ

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Paramount Tax & Accounting franchise?

The total investment to open a Paramount Tax & Accounting franchise ranges from $74K – $166K, with an initial franchise fee of $40K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Paramount Tax & Accounting franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Paramount Tax & Accounting FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $498K. The median is $204K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Paramount Tax & Accounting?

Paramount Tax & Accounting is franchised by Paramount Franchising LLC. Its parent company is Paramount Tax & Accounting CPAS PLLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Paramount Tax & Accounting CPAs PLLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Paramount Tax & Accounting FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Paramount Tax & Accounting FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Paramount Tax & Accounting's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Paramount Tax & Accounting (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Paramount Tax & Accounting franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Paramount Tax & Accounting has 92 total units in the United States, including 90 franchised units and 2 company-owned units. 15 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Paramount Tax & Accounting a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Paramount Tax & Accounting as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 89 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Paramount Tax & Accounting, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Financial Services franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Financial Services category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.