Bottom line
- Total investment $121K – $156K including a $49K franchise fee.
- Average unit revenue of $1.3M/year. Estimated payback in 0.3 years.
- Rated MODERATE with a risk score of 55/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 6 loans (below the industry average).
- Emerging franchise — only 3 years of franchising with 7 units. Early-stage systems carry higher risk but may offer better territory availability.
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Yale framework · single-unit ROIC
Returns Analysis
Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.
The model · Yale framework
What would one MosquitoNix unit return on the cash you put in?
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
92%
Above typical band (30–60%)
Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing
What would 25 MosquitoNix units return on equity?
Equity IRR · 5-yr
49.9%
7.57× MOIC
Year-1 DSCR
1.88×
EBITDA ÷ debt service
Equity required
$1.0M
on $5.2M purchase
Total debt
$4.2M
SBA $2.6M + senior + seller note
Overview
About
MosquitoNix franchisees operate mosquito and pest control treatment services, visiting residential and commercial properties to apply treatments, monitor infestations, and manage customer relationships. Day-to-day work includes scheduling service appointments, conducting property inspections, applying pesticide treatments, customer communication, and managing service routes across their protected territory.
Item 7 · what it costs
The Vitals
Item 19
Financial Performance
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 13 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17
Risk & Legal
Micro-franchise with unverified financials, opaque growth metrics, and insufficient unit base to validate business model sustainability.
Score breakdown · what drove the 55 / 100 rating
- 01MEDOnly 7 units systemwide indicates extremely limited scale and unproven franchise model replicability
- 02HIGHNo Item 19 financial performance disclosure (Going Concern = False) prevents validation of $443k avg net income claim
- 03MINORHigh royalty ceiling (10%) combined with minimum weekly fees creates unpredictable cost structure for low-revenue periods
- 04MINORUnknown unit growth trajectory suggests franchisor may not track or disclose performance metrics
- 05MINORMinimal franchise base raises questions about franchisor's ability to support franchisees or sustain operations
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
Item 11
Training & Operations
Item 20
Franchisee Contacts
Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.
Franchisee contacts
13 numbers
One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included
FDD download
MosquitoNix · FDD (2024) PDF