Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Mighty Dog Roofing logo

Mighty Dog Roofing Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Home ServicesNEFranchising since 2020
AStrongest tierStrongest tier70/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$172K – $224K
Disclosed sales
$1.5M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
10.5%
on 127 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01630FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent81%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Mighty Dog Roofing is a home-services franchise providing residential and commercial roof repair, replacement, and inspection. Franchisees run a crew-based operation handling estimates, insurance-claim work, and installations in a protected territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Mighty Dog Roofing franchise requires a total initial investment of $172K – $224K, including a $60K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average revenue per franchisee was $1.5M. This franchisor reports Item 19 per franchisee rather than per outlet, so the figure is not comparable with per-outlet averages[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 10.5% charge-off rate across 127 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored4 of 6 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$172K – $224K
71st pct Home Services
Avg gross sales
$1.5M
Per franchisee, not per outlet
Royalty
6.0%
21st pct Home Services
Units
388
84th pct Home Services
SBA charge-off
10.5%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Home Services · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$172K – $224K
Median $168K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$60K – $60K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$20K – $40K
Median $29K
near median
Avg Revenue
$1.5M
Median $587K
Per franchisee, not per outlet
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 6.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
9.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
10.5%
127 loans · Median 15.4%
below median ↓, better than category
System Size
388 units
Median 47 units
above median ↑, better than category
Counts territories, not premises
Turnover Rate
10.6%
Median 4.3%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
8 cases
Review carefully

Green = favorable by >10% vs Home Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $172K – $224K including a $60K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage revenue per franchisee of $1.5M/year. Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures.
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 70/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 10.5% across 127 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +34 franchised outlets in the latest year (75 opened, 0 closed); 20 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • FLAG41 units terminated last reporting year (10.6% of the system). Ask existing franchisees why.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
MDR United LLC
Parent company
JEZ Investments LLC
FDD Item 1, page 11 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
Roof Roof Franchising, LLC
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Anthony Hulbert
Incorporated in
PA
HQ
2525 N. 117th Avenue, Third Floor, Omaha, Nebraska 68164
Auditor
Forvis Mazars, LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$14.2M
vs $10.8M prior year

Affiliated brands

  • HPB Automotive Sales
  • MDR United Holdings
  • HPB Accounting
  • HorsePower Nation
  • HPB Blinds and Shutters

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 11

8 other brands on this site name JEZ Investments LLC as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Anthony Hulbert
Headquarters
NE
Founded
2020
FDD year
2025
States available
34

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 18% above the typical home services franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$172K – $224KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 35 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$59,500Verified — printed on page 20 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Ad fund0.0%Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Working capital$20K – $40K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Mighty Dog Roofing: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$60K$60K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$20K$40K
Equipment, build-out, other$92K$124K
Total initial investment$172K$224K

Source: Mighty Dog Roofing 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$172K – $224K
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$20K – $40K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$60K – $60K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
0.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Mighty Dog Roofing: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund0.0%
Technology fee$792
Training fee$5K
Transfer fee$12K
Renewal fee$12K
Total fee load9.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 153% above the home services norm.

Avg gross sales$1.5M

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 85 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typeGross Sales by quartile (m…
Sample size83 franchisees

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Mighty Dog Roofing until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$228K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Mighty Dog Roofing unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per franchisee, per year (NOT per outlet)FDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,484,000 per franchisee — not per outlet. Every other input below is for ONE unit; replace this with a single-unit figure before relying on the ROIC.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $172K–$224K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $20K–$40K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$228K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Avg gross sales
$1.5M
Per franchisee, per year — not per outlet

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
Gross Sales by quartile (multi-territory franchisees) + single-territory data
Sample size
83 franchisees
vs category median 32 · large
Quartile band
$279K→$3.4M
Bottom 25% → top 25%, per franchisee
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank71th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank21th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank84th
vs Home Services peers
Risk score rank24th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 319 Home Services brands

Showing the headline figures — all 142 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

The average franchisee generates $1.5M/year in gross sales.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 9.0% (near the Home Services median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 60.3% CAGR over 3 years across 388 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Home Services medians

How Mighty Dog Roofing Compares

Metric
Mighty Dog Roofing
Category median
vs median
Investment
$198K
$168Kmiddle half $122K–$232K · n=283
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.5M
$587Kmiddle half $376K–$1.3M · n=79
Not compared

Per franchisee, not per outlet - the category median is per-outlet only, so no comparison is shown

Unit Count
388
47middle half 14–137 · n=283
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Home Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units388Verified — printed on page 88 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+60.3% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate10.6% (caution)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

This filing counts territories

This franchisor's Item 20 states that its outlet tables count territories rather than individual premises, so the figure above is a count of territories. We label a brand here only where its filing says so, and a brand that counts territories without stating it cannot be identified from its text — so this is not a complete list.

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
388
Opened
75
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
41
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
10.6%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+60.3%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+60.3%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
41
Not renewed
0
Transferred
20
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
20
0.05 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
25
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2022
242
Franchised units
2023
354+112
Franchised units
2024
388+34
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 33 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 33 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • California
  • Hawaii
  • Maryland
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • New York
  • North Dakota
  • Rhode Island
  • Washington

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

99 current owners across 33 states.

  • FL 14
  • PA 6
  • TX 6
  • CO 5
  • GA 5
  • MI 5
  • TN 5
  • AZ 4
  • MA 4
  • NC 4
  • NJ 4
  • OH 4
  • +21 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

B
SBA Lending Health
Strong SBA lending record · 10.5% charge-off
Total loans
127
Loan volume
$29.2M
Median loan
$292K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
10.5%
on 127 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
89.5%
5-yr charge-off
10.5%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
10
Defaults
2
Typical loan rate
8.6%
avg rate to borrowers
vs industry
17.4%
brand is below its industry ↓
Jobs supported
923
3.2 per loan
Lender concentration
86%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 99% went to startups / new businesses, 1% to established operators

Vintage analysis

Mighty Dog Roofing charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Mighty Dog Roofing charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 3 vintages from 2021 to 2023. Rates range from 0.0% to 28.6%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%'21'22'23

Top lenders financing Mighty Dog Roofing franchisees

The Huntington National Bank109 loans11.1%
First Bank of the Lake7 loans—
Cadence Bank2 loans—

Showing 3 of 10 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Mighty Dog Roofing from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.3%
Avg SBA guarantee
67%
Avg interest rate
8.61%
Avg chargeoff amount
$37K
Lender concentration
85.8%
Job velocity
3.2 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
17.4%
NAICS 238160
Jobs supported
923

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 86% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank109$23.4M11.1%
2First Bank of the Lake7$2.3MN/A
3Cadence Bank2$709KN/A
4Banner Bank2$291K0.0%
5First Commonwealth Bank2$785KN/A
6TD Bank, National Association1$322KN/A
7Arizona Financial Credit Union1$264KN/A
8Dogwood State Bank1$548KN/A
9German American Bank1$252KN/A
10SouthState Bank, National Association1$350KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas20125.0%
FLFlorida170--
NJNew Jersey90--
COColorado8125.0%
GAGeorgia700.0%
MIMichigan600.0%
NCNorth Carolina60--
TNTennessee60--
KSKansas40--
MNMinnesota40--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2021
12
2022
43
2023
58
2024
10
2025
3
2026
1

Borrower profile

Startup125 (98%)
New (< 2 yr)1 (1%)
Existing (2+ yr)1 (1%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 10.5% — 34% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off10.5% · 127 loans
Verdict score70/100 (higher is better)
Litigation8 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier70Verdict score 70/100

Meaningful litigation risk with five pending franchisee rescission claims, absence of earnings disclosure, and modest growth despite 388 units warrant cautious due diligence before commitment.

High confidence±4 pts
6674

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

4 franchisor-initiated suits against former franchisees for non-compete/royalty violations (Backporch Partners, TRI JB Corp, Flex Nine Exteriors, Warrior Home Services); 4 suits filed against franchisor by franchisees alleging fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of contract (Labento LLC, ECR Home Concepts, Gortz Enterprises, JMR Capital Holdings)

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Forvis Mazars, LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $14.2MYr 2: $10.8MNon-royalty: $2.5M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

FY2024 audited Statement of Income: Franchise fees $3,425,936; Royalties $8,307,137; Other service fees $2,472,373; total revenues $14,205,446. Members' deficit (negative equity) of $(674,704) at 12/31/2024.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: No
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 70 / 100 verdict

  1. 01HIGHNine total litigation actions (4 franchisor-initiated + 5 franchisee rescission claims) indicate material disputes and potential misrepresentation issues
  2. 02MINORNo Item 19 (Average Net Income) disclosure prevents accurate ROI assessment despite $171.5K-$224K initial investment
  3. 03MINORFive pending franchisee rescission lawsuits based on misrepresentation allegations suggest systemic disclosure or performance promise problems
  4. 04MINOR9.6% YoY unit growth is modest for a roofing services franchise; slower growth may indicate market saturation or franchisee dissatisfaction
  5. 05MINORTiered royalty structure with $500 minimum floor means lower-revenue franchisees pay disproportionately (up to 6% vs promised 2% at scale)

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 142 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training93 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population50,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ25 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ1
Curable defaultsℹ3
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationBucks County, Pennsylvania
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawPA
Litigation count8
View Item 3 litigation summary

4 franchisor-initiated suits against former franchisees for non-compete/royalty violations (Backporch Partners, TRI JB Corp, Flex Nine Exteriors, Warrior Home Services); 4 suits filed against franchisor by franchisees alleging fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of contract (Labento LLC, ECR Home Concepts, Gortz Enterprises, JMR Capital Holdings)

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
36 hrs
On-the-job training
57 hrs
Training location
Omaha, Nebraska (Phase III); online/webinar (Phase I and II)
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
6 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisor defines Protected Territory; franchisee selects home office or leased location within territory subject to franchisor approval
Franchisor financing
Offered
Item 10
POS system
POS System
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: POS System

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

99 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 99 contacts · $49
Free preview
(803) 717-••••SC
Unlock all 99 contacts
(513) 613-••••OH
(480) 934-••••AZ
(614) 321-••••OH
(919) 655-••••NC

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Mighty Dog Roofing franchise?

The total investment to open a Mighty Dog Roofing franchise ranges from $172K – $224K, with an initial franchise fee of $60K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Mighty Dog Roofing franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Mighty Dog Roofing FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.5M. Important context: Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Mighty Dog Roofing?

Mighty Dog Roofing is franchised by MDR United LLC. Its parent company is JEZ Investments LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Mighty Dog Roofing FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Mighty Dog Roofing FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Mighty Dog Roofing's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Mighty Dog Roofing has a charge-off rate of 10.5% across 127 loans, meaning 10.5% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Mighty Dog Roofing franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Mighty Dog Roofing has 388 total units in the United States, including 388 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 75 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Mighty Dog Roofing a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Mighty Dog Roofing as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 70 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Mighty Dog Roofing, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Home Services franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Home Services category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.