Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Marco's Pizza logo

Marco's Pizza Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsOHFranchising since 2004
AStrongest tierStrongest tier90/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$287K – $807K
Disclosed sales
$934K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
7.6%
on 460 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01571FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent95%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Marco's Pizza is a quick-service pizza franchise positioned on fresh, quality ingredients and Italian-quality pies. Franchisees run stores for delivery and carryout, managing kitchen staff, food quality, and local marketing.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Marco's Pizza franchise requires a total initial investment of $287K – $807K, including a $25K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.5% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $934K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 7.6% charge-off rate across 460 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$287K – $807K
46th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$934K
Net sales17th pct Service Resta…
Royalty
5.5%
44th pct Service Resta…
Units
1,159
93rd pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
7.6%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$287K – $807K
Median $486K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$25K – $25K
Median $35K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$9K – $30K
Median $33K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$934K
Median $975K
near median
Net sales
Royalty Rate
5.5%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
10.5% of rev
Median 7.5%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
7.6%
460 loans · Median 14.3%
below median ↓, better than category
System Size
1,159 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
2.2%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
16 cases
Review carefully

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $287K – $807K including a $25K franchise fee, 5.5% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $934K/year (median $886K).
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 90/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 7.6% across 460 loans (near or below the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +43 franchised outlets in the latest year (68 opened, 25 closed); 176 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • LEGAL16 litigation matters disclosed in Item 3, higher than typical. Review the summary for patterns (franchisor-initiated vs. franchisee-initiated).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Marco's Franchising, LLC
Parent company
Marco's Pizza Holdings, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
MP Marks, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
and Certain Affiliates
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Co-CEO
John Butorac
CEO experience
20 yrs
Years in role or industry
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
OH
HQ
5252 Monroe Street, Toledo, Ohio 43623
Auditor
BDO USA, P.C.
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$121.9M
vs $111.7M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Independent franchisee associations

  • Independent Franchisee Association

Franchisee-led councils or alliances disclosed in Item 20. Indicates operator voice.

Affiliated brands

  • has ever engaged in

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
John Butorac
Headquarters
OH
Founded
2004
FDD year
2025
States available
34

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 13% above the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$287K – $807KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 36 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$25,000Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 37 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Royalty5.5%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 23 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 30 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$9K – $30K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Marco's Pizza: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$25K$25K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$9K$30K
Equipment, build-out, other$253K$752K
Total initial investment$287K$807K

Source: Marco's Pizza 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$287K – $807K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$9K – $30K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$25K – $25K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
5.5%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
5.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
10.5%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Marco's Pizza: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.5% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund5.0%
Technology fee$111
Training fee$9K
Transfer fee$8K
Renewal fee$6K
Inventory (initial)$7K – $11K
Total fee load10.5% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales land near the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$934K

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 90 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$886KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 90 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typenet royalty sales
Sample size955 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Marco's Pizza until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$566K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Marco's Pizza unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $934,318 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $287K–$807K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $9K–$30K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$566K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Avg gross sales
$934K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$886K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
net royalty sales
Sample size
955 outlets
vs category median 19 · large
Range (low → high)
$340K→$2.2MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 90 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$586K→$1.4M
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank17th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank46th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank44th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank93th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank1th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 162 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $934K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.7x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 10.5% — above the Quick-Service Restaurants median of 7.5%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 9.4% CAGR over 3 years across 1,159 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How Marco's Pizza Compares

Metric
Marco's Pizza
Category median
vs median
Investment
$547K
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$934K
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Near median
Unit Count
1,159
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units1,159Verified — printed on page 94 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+9.4% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate2.2% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
1,159
Opened
68
Last reporting year
Closed
25
Terminated
6
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
2.2%
Company-owned
45
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
96%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+9.4%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+9.4%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
6
Not renewed
0
Transferred
89
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
176
0.15 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
79
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
7.2%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Termination rate
1.9%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
0.6%
Units that stopped operating
2022
1,018
Franchised units
2023
1,071+53
Franchised units
2024
1,114+43
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 25 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 25 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • California
  • Indiana
  • Maryland
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • New York
  • North Dakota
  • South Dakota
  • Virginia
  • Wisconsin

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

99 current owners across 25 states.

  • TX 23
  • FL 20
  • VA 8
  • GA 4
  • NC 4
  • NV 4
  • TN 4
  • CA 3
  • CO 3
  • KY 3
  • AL 2
  • IN 2
  • +13 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

B
SBA Lending Health
Strong SBA lending record · 7.6% charge-off
Total loans
460
Loan volume
$164.4M
Median loan
$345K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
7.6%
on 460 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
92.4%
5-yr charge-off
4.8%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
95
Defaults
21
Typical loan rate
6.7%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
10.8%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
11,526
7.0 per loan
Lender concentration
8%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 80% went to startups / new businesses, 20% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in limited-service restaurants, franchised businesses charge off at 10.8% vs 10.0% for independents — franchising is associated with 8% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Marco's Pizza charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Marco's Pizza charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 14 vintages from 2005 to 2022. Rates range from 0.0% to 50.0%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%'05'12'15'18'21'22

Top lenders financing Marco's Pizza franchisees

KeyBank National Association37 loans0.0%
The Bancorp Bank National Association32 loans0.0%
The Huntington National Bank25 loans15.4%

Showing 3 of 95 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
3
Loan volume
$460K
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
21

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Marco's Pizza from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
2.7%
Avg SBA guarantee
75%
Avg interest rate
6.74%
Avg chargeoff amount
$210K
Lender concentration
8.0%
Job velocity
7.0 per $100K
Startup risk premium
+7.5pp
NAICS benchmark
8.7%
NAICS 722513
Jobs supported
11,526

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 8% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1KeyBank National Association37$15.1M0.0%
2The Bancorp Bank National Association32$11.4M0.0%
3The Huntington National Bank25$5.5M15.4%
4Ameris Bank25$8.6M0.0%
5Oriental Bank17$5.4M0.0%
6PromiseOne Bank16$5.0M15.4%
7Stearns Bank National Association15$4.9M23.1%
8BancFirst15$6.5M7.1%
9United Community Bank15$6.1M0.0%
10Customers Bank14$5.6M0.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas9624.1%
GAGeorgia6424.3%
FLFlorida4928.3%
PRPuerto Rico3200.0%
OHOhio2700.0%
NCNorth Carolina2300.0%
MIMichigan22318.8%
VAVirginia19222.2%
TNTennessee1600.0%
CACalifornia15114.3%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

1992
1
1994
2
1995
2
1996
1
1997
1
1998
2
1999
1
2002
2
2004
1
2005
6
2006
2
2007
3
2008
1
2009
1
2010
2
2011
6
2012
4
2013
18
2014
28
2015
41
2016
39
2017
40
2018
48
2019
42
2020
19
2021
59
2022
19
2023
20
2024
24
2025
18
2026
7

Borrower profile

Startup184 (72%)
Ownership change25 (10%)
Existing (2+ yr)20 (8%)
New (< 2 yr)18 (7%)
Unanswered7 (3%)
New (< 1 yr)1 (0%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 7.6% — 53% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off7.6% · 460 loans
Verdict score90/100 (higher is better)
Litigation16 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier90Verdict score 90/100

Marco's Pizza presents moderate-to-cautionary risk due to undisclosed profitability metrics, multiple active litigation cases, sluggish growth, and collection actions suggesting potential franchisee performance or compliance issues.

High confidence±4 pts
8694

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

2 pending defendant cases (area representative disputes); multiple franchisor-initiated collection actions against former franchisees; 2 prior actions settled (Cajunland Pizza settled for $310,000; SC America settled for $100,000 plus equipment purchase)

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · BDO USA, P.C.

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $121.9MYr 2: $111.7MNon-royalty: $14.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Consolidated financial statements of Marco's Franchising, LLC and Subsidiaries (a wholly owned subsidiary of Marco's Pizza Holdings, LLC), audited by BDO USA, P.C., fiscal years ended Dec 29, 2024 and Dec 31, 2023.

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 90 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORNo Item 19 (Average Net Income) disclosure — cannot verify actual profitability claims despite $934K average revenue
  2. 02HIGHMultiple ongoing litigation cases involving former area representatives (American Eagle, KAM Development) and franchisor collection actions suggest systemic relationship issues
  3. 03MINORSlow unit growth (4.0% YoY) combined with collection actions against former franchisees indicates potential performance/retention problems
  4. 04MINORHigh investment range ($286K-$807K) with 5.5% royalty lacks transparency on typical break-even timeline without net income data
  5. 05HIGHPattern of franchisor-initiated litigation (J&J ZA, FirstSlice, Cajunland Pizza) raises questions about enforcement practices and franchisee support quality

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 162 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 10.5% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training362 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius1 mi
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ5 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ1
Curable defaultsℹ5
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Arbitration locationToledo, Ohio (mediation)
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawOH
Litigation count16
View Item 3 litigation summary

2 pending defendant cases (area representative disputes); multiple franchisor-initiated collection actions against former franchisees; 2 prior actions settled (Cajunland Pizza settled for $310,000; SC America settled for $100,000 plus equipment purchase)

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
96 hrs
On-the-job training
266 hrs
Training location
Marco's University (Toledo, OH support center) and certified training stores
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
franchisee with franchisor approval; approved real estate brokers required
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
MOMS (Marco's Order Management System) provided by MTS
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: MOMS (Marco's Order Management System) provided by MTS

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

99 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 99 contacts · $49
Free preview
(254) 981-••••TX
Unlock all 99 contacts
(404) 938-••••GA
(210) 986-••••FL
(303) 882-••••CO
(256) 640-••••KY

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Marco's Pizza franchise?

The total investment to open a Marco's Pizza franchise ranges from $287K – $807K, with an initial franchise fee of $25K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Marco's Pizza franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Marco's Pizza FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $934K. The median is $886K. Important context: Reported as net sales, not gross sales. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Marco's Pizza?

Marco's Pizza is franchised by Marco's Franchising, LLC. Its parent company is Marco's Pizza Holdings, LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is MP Marks, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Marco's Pizza FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Marco's Pizza FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Marco's Pizza's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Marco's Pizza has a charge-off rate of 7.6% across 460 loans, meaning 7.6% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Marco's Pizza franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Marco's Pizza has 1,159 total units in the United States, including 1,114 franchised units and 45 company-owned units. 68 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Marco's Pizza a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Marco's Pizza as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 90 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Marco's Pizza, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.