B60/100FDD 2025
Juiced Fuel — Litigation & Risk
Food & Beverage - Quick Service · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5
Lower Risk
No litigation cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.
Source: FDD Items 3–5
FDD Items 3 & 4
Litigation Metrics
Cases disclosed
0
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
—
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
60 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
MODERATE
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID
FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up
Contract Risk Indicators
Mandatory arbitration
Required
Disputes resolved outside court — limits your legal options
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
South Carolina
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there
What drove the 60/100 rating
Risk Score Breakdown
- 01MINOROnly 1 franchised unit reported — system shows zero growth trajectory and no proof of replicable model
- 02HIGHGoing Concern status is FALSE — suggests franchisor financial instability or viability questions
- 03MINORHigh franchise fee ($59,500) + royalties ($500-$2,000/month) against unproven single-unit system creates recovery risk
- 04HIGHNo disclosed litigation but single-unit system lacks track record to assess legal exposure
- 05MINORAverage net income of $87,702 is attractive but based on n=1 — statistically meaningless and likely outlier
- 06MINOR10-year term locks capital into unvalidated brand with no multi-unit success stories
Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification
Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.