Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
iFoam logo

iFoam Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Home ServicesNEFranchising since 2022
FWeakest tierWeakest tier24/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$172K – $266K
Disclosed sales
$1.4M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
26.7%
on 66 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01278FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent91%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

iFoam is a home-services franchise installing spray-foam and other insulation for homes and businesses. Franchisees run a crew-based operation handling assessments, installs, and scheduling in a territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A iFoam franchise requires a total initial investment of $172K – $266K, including a $15K – $20K franchise fee. Per the 2025 FDD, average revenue per franchisee was $1.4M. This franchisor reports Item 19 per franchisee rather than per outlet, so the figure is not comparable with per-outlet averages[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 26.7% charge-off rate across 66 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: F (Weakest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: 2025 filing · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - a newer filing may exist

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored5 of 6 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$172K – $266K
71st pct Home Services
Avg gross sales
$1.4M
Per franchisee, not per outlet
Royalty
Flat fee
Units
90
57th pct Home Services
SBA charge-off
26.7%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Home Services · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$172K – $266K
Median $168K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$15K – $20K
Median $50K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$20K – $40K
Median $29K
near median
Avg Revenue
$1.4M
Median $587K
Per franchisee, not per outlet
Royalty Rate
Not extracted
Median 6.0%
Ongoing Fees
Not extracted
Median 8.0%
SBA Charge-Off Rate
26.7%
66 loans · Median 15.4%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
90 units
Median 47 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
55.8%
Median 4.3%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
2 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Home Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $172K – $266K including a $15K franchise fee.
  • RETURNSAverage revenue per franchisee of $1.4M/year (median $1.2M). Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures.
  • RISKVerdict F (Weakest tier), verdict score 24/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 26.7% across 66 loans (well above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -30 franchised outlets in the latest year (18 opened, 48 closed); 4 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • FLAG48 units terminated last reporting year (53.3% of the system). Ask existing franchisees why.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
HPB Foam LLC
Parent company
JEZ Investments LLC
FDD Item 1, page 11 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
I-Foam LLC / iFOAM Franchise Group LLC
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Group President
Michael McAllister
Incorporated in
PA
HQ
2525 N. 117th Avenue, Third Floor, Omaha, NE 68164
Auditor
Forvis Mazars, LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$4.0M
vs $3.1M prior year

Affiliated brands

  • HorsePower Nation
  • HPB Accounting
  • HPB Foam Holdings

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 11

8 other brands on this site name JEZ Investments LLC as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Michael McAllister
Headquarters
NE
Founded
2021
FDD year
2025
States available
16

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 30% above the typical home services franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$172K – $266KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 25 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$15,000Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
RoyaltyFlat fee
Ad fundNot extracted
Working capital$20K – $40K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

iFoam: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$15K$15K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$20K$40K
Equipment, build-out, other$137K$211K
Total initial investment$172K$266K

Source: iFoam 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$172K – $266K
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$20K – $40K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$15K – $20K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
Greater of $3,000/month or $3.00 per 1,000 general popula…
Ad fund
No required advertising fund contribution; one-time Brand…

Ongoing fees · Item 6

iFoam: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty (flat)Greater of $3,000/month or $3.00 per 1,000 general population per Protected Territory
Technology fee$60
Training fee$5K
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$3K
Inventory (initial)$19K – $25K

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 131% above the home services norm.

Avg gross sales$1.4M

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 70 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$1.2MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 70 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size20 franchisees

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for iFoam until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for royalty rate, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$249K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one iFoam unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per franchisee, per year (NOT per outlet)FDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,358,373 per franchisee — not per outlet. Every other input below is for ONE unit; replace this with a single-unit figure before relying on the ROIC.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundnot set
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $172K–$266K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $20K–$40K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for royalty rate, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$249K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for royalty rate, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Avg gross sales
$1.4M
Per franchisee, per year — not per outlet
Median gross sales
$1.2M
Per franchisee, not per outlet

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
20 franchisees
vs category median 32
Range (low → high)
$88K→$5.4MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 70 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank71th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank
No comparison data
Unit count rank57th
vs Home Services peers
Risk score rank99th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 319 Home Services brands

Showing the headline figures — all 155 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

The average franchisee generates $1.4M/year in gross sales.

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 196.6% CAGR over 3 years across 90 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Home Services medians

How iFoam Compares

Metric
iFoam
Category median
vs median
Investment
$219K
$168Kmiddle half $122K–$232K · n=283
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.4M
$587Kmiddle half $376K–$1.3M · n=79
Not compared

Per franchisee, not per outlet - the category median is per-outlet only, so no comparison is shown

Unit Count
90
47middle half 14–137 · n=283
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Home Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units90Verified — printed on page 73 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth-25.9% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate55.8% (caution)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
90
Opened
18
Last reporting year
Closed
48
Terminated
48
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
55.8%
Company-owned
4
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
96%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-25.9%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+196.6%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
48
Not renewed
0
Transferred
3
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
4
0.04 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
4
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
2.5%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Continuity rate
64.2%
Units that stayed open
Termination rate
40.0%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
25.0%
Units that stopped operating
2022
29
Franchised units
2023
116+87
Franchised units
2024
86-30
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 15 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 15 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • California
  • Hawaii
  • Maryland
  • New York
  • Washington
  • Wisconsin

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

22 current owners across 15 states.

  • CO 3
  • TX 3
  • AL 2
  • FL 2
  • NC 2
  • AR 1
  • AZ 1
  • GA 1
  • ID 1
  • MO 1
  • ND 1
  • NE 1
  • +3 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

Growth insight

A system losing more than 10% of its units year-over-year is a red flag. Check whether closures are concentrated in specific regions.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

F
SBA Lending Health
Weak SBA lending record · 26.7% charge-off
Total loans
66
Loan volume
$28.4M
Median loan
$626K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
26.7%
on 66 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
73.3%
5-yr charge-off
26.7%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
4
Defaults
4
Typical loan rate
9.9%
avg rate to borrowers
vs industry
15.9%
brand is above its industry ↑
Jobs supported
594
2.1 per loan
Lender concentration
92%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 100% went to startups / new businesses, 0% to established operators

Top lenders financing iFoam franchisees

The Huntington National Bank61 loans26.7%
Pinnacle Bank3 loans—
First Bank of the Lake1 loans—

Showing 3 of 4 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for iFoam from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
2.3%
Avg SBA guarantee
64%
Avg interest rate
9.92%
Avg chargeoff amount
$164K
Lender concentration
92.4%
Job velocity
2.1 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
15.9%
NAICS 238310
Jobs supported
594

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 92% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank61$25.0M26.7%
2Pinnacle Bank3$2.0MN/A
3First Bank of the Lake1$709KN/A
4OakStar Bank1$700KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas21480.0%
COColorado80--
TNTennessee500.0%
FLFlorida400.0%
GAGeorgia400.0%
SCSouth Carolina400.0%
UTUtah40--
ALAlabama200.0%
IDIdaho200.0%
ILIllinois20--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2022
11
2023
50
2024
5

Borrower profile

Startup65 (98%)
New (< 2 yr)1 (2%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

A 26.7% charge-off rate means roughly 1 in 4 franchisees failed to repay their SBA loan. Investigate what changed.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 26.7% — 66% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off26.7% · 66 loans
Verdict score24/100 (higher is better)
Litigation2 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

FWeakest tier24Verdict score 24/100
High confidence±4 pts
2028

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

1 pending civil action (Schaefer v. HPB Foam LLC, E.D.Pa.) alleging fraud, misrepresentation, and breach of contract by former franchisee; 1 material civil action involving parent/affiliate (Beutler v. Skolnick et al., AAA arbitration over governance/ownership disputes)

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Forvis Mazars, LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $4.0MYr 2: $3.1MNon-royalty: $0.6M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

2024 audited revenue of $4,015,149 comprises franchise fees $2,485,722, royalties $939,354, and other service fees $590,073. Fiscal year end December 31. Statements audited by Forvis Mazars, LLP; company operates with a members' deficit of $(1,765,342).

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 24 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDSevere unit decline of -25.9% YoY (90 units) signals system deterioration and franchisee dissatisfaction
  2. 02HIGHActive fraud/misrepresentation lawsuit from former franchisee combined with internal ownership arbitration suggests governance dysfunction and potential credibility issues
  3. 03MEDNet income not disclosed despite $1.36M average revenue—lack of transparency on profitability is a major red flag
  4. 04MEDHigh royalty structure (greater of $3,000/month or $3 per 1,000 population) may be unsustainable given undisclosed margins and shrinking unit base

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 155 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Initial term5 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training144 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term5 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ3
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population200,000
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeNo
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ25 mi
Right of first refusalℹNo
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice15 days
Termination groundsℹ1
Curable defaultsℹ1
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationBucks County, Pennsylvania
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawPA
Litigation count2
View Item 3 litigation summary

1 pending civil action (Schaefer v. HPB Foam LLC, E.D.Pa.) alleging fraud, misrepresentation, and breach of contract by former franchisee; 1 material civil action involving parent/affiliate (Beutler v. Skolnick et al., AAA arbitration over governance/ownership disputes)

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
112 hrs
On-the-job training
32 hrs
Training location
Virtual (Phase I and II); Omaha, NE (Phase III)
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
5 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee with franchisor approval
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
ServiceTitan
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✗Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: ServiceTitan

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

22 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 22 contacts · $49
Free preview
801-820-••••UT
Unlock all 22 contacts
334-318-••••AL
919-891-••••NC
256-202-••••AL
404-997-••••GA

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a iFoam franchise?

The total investment to open a iFoam franchise ranges from $172K – $266K, with an initial franchise fee of $15K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do iFoam franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the iFoam FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.4M. The median is $1.2M. Important context: Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns iFoam?

iFoam is franchised by HPB Foam LLC. Its parent company is JEZ Investments LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the iFoam FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the iFoam FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is iFoam's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, iFoam has a charge-off rate of 26.7% across 66 loans, meaning 26.7% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many iFoam franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, iFoam has 90 total units in the United States, including 86 franchised units and 4 company-owned units. 18 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is iFoam a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates iFoam as a F-grade franchise with a verdict score of 24 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent iFoam, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Home Services franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Home Services category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.