Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
HTEAO logo

Hteao Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsTXFranchising since 2018
AStrongest tierStrongest tier81/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$387K – $1.9M
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
0.0%
on 47 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01244FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent81%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

HTeaO is a drive-thru franchise specializing in a wide selection of freshly brewed iced teas, plus flavored waters and coffee. Franchisees run drive-thru stores managing tea brewing, service, and staffing.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A HTEAO franchise requires a total initial investment of $387K – $1.9M, including a $25K – $40K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. The 2025 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. SBA 7(a) loans show a 0.0% charge-off rate across 47 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 6 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$387K – $1.9M
62nd pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
N/A
Outlet subset
Royalty
6.0%
48th pct Service Resta…
Units
144
79th pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
0.0%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$387K – $1.9M
Median $486K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$25K – $40K
Median $35K
near median
Liquid Capital Req'd
$10K – $100K
Median $33K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
0.0%
47 loans · Median 14.3%
below median ↓, better than category
System Size
144 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
1.5%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $387K – $1.9M including a $40K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSItem 19 reports outlet revenue, but not in a form that yields a per-outlet average we can compare across brands.
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 81/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 0.0% across 47 loans (well below the franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHNegative, pipeline stalled: 177 agreements signed but not yet open against 144 open outlets (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 129.8% CAGR over 3 years with 144 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
HTEAO FC, LLC
Parent company
HTO LLC
FDD Item 1, page 6 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
HTO Holdco, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 6 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
HTeaO FC, LLLP
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
President and Chief Executive Officer
Justin Howe
Incorporated in
TX
HQ
1322 Ranchers Legacy Trail, Fort Worth, Texas 76126
Auditor
Whitley Penn LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$13.5M
vs $10.0M prior year

Affiliated brands

  • TBevCo
  • TBevCo IP
  • TeaBevCo
  • Brand

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
Justin Howe
Headquarters
TX
Founded
2009
FDD year
2025
States available
8

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 136% above the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$387K – $1.9MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 17 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$40,000Verified — printed on page 10 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 11 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 11 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$10K – $100K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown17 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Feenot refundable$40K$40K
Rent (3 months)not refundable$5K$38K
Utility and Lease Security Depositsnot refundable$0$13K
Opening Day Promotion and Initial Marketing Campaignnot refundable$15K$25K
Lease Negotiations Assistancenot refundable$0$5K
Design and Architectural Feesnot refundable$0$80K
Licenses and Permitsnot refundable$1K$6K
Leasehold Improvementsnot refundable$0$1.1M
Signagenot refundable$10K$78K
Furniture and Fixturesnot refundable$30K$40K
POS/Back Office Systemnot refundable$20K$30K
Equipmentnot refundable$200K$296K
Professional Servicesnot refundable$3K$6K
Initial Inventorynot refundable$45K$50K
Insurancenot refundable$6K$12K
Training Expensesnot refundable$2K$10K
Additional Fundsnot refundable$10K$100K
Total initial investment$387K$1.9M

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$387K – $1.9M
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$10K – $100K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$25K – $40K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

HTEAO: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$450
Training fee$2K
Transfer fee$0
Renewal fee$0
Inventory (initial)$45K – $50K
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample sizeNot extracted

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for HTEAO is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one HTEAO unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $387K–$1.9M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $10K–$100K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$1.2M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Item 19 type
gross sales
Range (low → high)
$849K→$2.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 44 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
N/A→$1.5M
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
1 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · below
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank62th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank48th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank79th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank4th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 153 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Item 19 · by group

What the filing does disclose

Item 19 of this FDD reports performance in more than one group. We publish no single average for this brand; the groups the filing does disclose are listed below, quoted from its own Item 19 table.

Each row below is quoted from the FDD's own Item 19 table. Gross sales are not profit.

Outlet subset

Item 19 detail

top pct

SegmentSampleAvg
Franchised Stores - Top 10%10$1.7M
Franchised Stores - Top 25%24$1.5M
Franchised Stores - Top 50%48$1.3M
Franchised Stores - Top 75%72$1.2M
Blended (Franchised + Company-owned) - Top 10%10$1.8M
Blended (Franchised + Company-owned) - Top 25%26$1.5M
Blended (Franchised + Company-owned) - Top 50%52$1.3M
Blended (Franchised + Company-owned) - Top 75%78$1.2M

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Quick-Service Restaurants median).

Disclosure

Item 19 reports outlet revenue, but not in a form that yields a per-outlet average we can compare across brands.

Operator retention

System expanding at 129.8% CAGR over 3 years across 144 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How Hteao Compares

Metric
Hteao
Category median
vs median
Investment
$1.1M
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
N/A
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
N/A
Unit Count
144
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units144Verified — printed on page 46 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+129.8% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate1.5% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
144
Opened
42
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Turnover rate
1.5%
Company-owned
13
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
91%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+129.8%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+129.8%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Signed, not yet open
177
1.23 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
41
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2022
57
Franchised units
2023
94+37
Franchised units
2024
131+37
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 9 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 9 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

104 current owners across 9 states.

  • TX 74
  • OK 12
  • AL 4
  • KS 4
  • FL 3
  • NM 3
  • AR 2
  • LA 1
  • MO 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

A
SBA Lending Health
Excellent SBA lending record · 0.0% charge-off
Total loans
47
Loan volume
$54.9M
Median loan
$782K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
0.0%
on 47 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
100.0%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
23
Defaults
0
Typical loan rate
7.7%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
10.6%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
1,018
1.9 per loan
Lender concentration
23%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 94% went to startups / new businesses, 6% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in snack and nonalcoholic beverage bars, franchised businesses charge off at 10.6% vs 8.9% for independents — franchising is associated with 19% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Hteao franchisees

Bank Five Nine11 loans—
BancFirst7 loans0.0%
Amistad Bank4 loans—

Showing 3 of 23 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
21
Loan volume
$17.4M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
263

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Hteao from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.0%
Avg SBA guarantee
74%
Avg interest rate
7.72%
Lender concentration
23.4%
Job velocity
1.9 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
7.0%
NAICS 722515
Jobs supported
1,018

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 23% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Bank Five Nine11$18.1MN/A
2BancFirst7$6.0M0.0%
3Amistad Bank4$7.7MN/A
4Cadence Bank3$3.3MN/A
5Frost Bank2$1.2MN/A
6SouthWest Bank2$3.0M0.0%
7The Huntington National Bank2$2.1MN/A
8Gulf Coast Bank and Trust Company1$300K0.0%
9Truist Bank1$2.5MN/A
10Bank of Central Florida1$530KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas2900.0%
OKOklahoma800.0%
AZArizona30--
TNTennessee30--
FLFlorida20--
MOMissouri20--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2019
2
2020
6
2021
3
2022
9
2023
3
2024
5
2025
19

Borrower profile

Startup42 (89%)
Existing (2+ yr)3 (6%)
New (< 2 yr)2 (4%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

With a 0.0% charge-off rate across 47 loans, banks have historically viewed this brand favorably for lending.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 0.0% — 100% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off0.0% · 47 loans
Verdict score81/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier81Verdict score 81/100
High confidence±4 pts
7785

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation required to be disclosed in Item 3

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Whitley Penn LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $13.5MYr 2: $10.0MNon-royalty: $1.2M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

HTeaO FC, LLC audited statements of operations, years ended Dec 31 2024 and 2023 (Whitley Penn LLP, Plano TX). 2024 total revenues $13,529,547 comprising franchise fee $3,041,998, royalty $6,656,475, advertising fund $2,217,412, gift card $418,505, other $1,195,157. Net loss $(7,771,161); member's equity $34,683,299. Company changed deferred franchise fee revenue recognition method (Note B).

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 81 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORWide investment range ($387K–$1.9M spread of 392%) suggests inconsistent unit economics or unclear cost structure
  2. 02MINORExplosive 39.4% YoY unit growth may indicate aggressive recruitment ahead of sustainable sales infrastructure
  3. 03MED6% royalty on undisclosed revenue creates unpredictable franchisor cash flow and potential pressure on unit profitability
  4. 04MEDNo litigation disclosed but going concern flag suggests potential hidden disputes or regulatory scrutiny

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 153 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term15 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training41 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term15 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ25 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ1
Curable defaultsℹ4
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationFort Worth, Texas (AAA offices in city of franchisor's principal place of business)
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawTX
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation required to be disclosed in Item 3

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
27 hrs
On-the-job training
14 hrs
Training location
Fort Worth, TX
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
12 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee selects, franchisor approves within 30 days
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Revel POS System
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: Revel POS System

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

104 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 104 contacts · $49
Free preview
830-305-••••TX
Unlock all 104 contacts
432-266-••••TX
(915) 588-••••TX
(817) 980-••••TX
806-441-••••TX

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a HTEAO franchise?

The total investment to open a HTEAO franchise ranges from $387K – $1.9M, with an initial franchise fee of $40K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do HTEAO franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the HTEAO FDD discloses outlet figures from $849K to $2.1M but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns HTEAO?

HTEAO is franchised by HTEAO FC, LLC. Its parent company is HTO LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is HTO Holdco, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the HTEAO FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the HTEAO FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is HTEAO's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, HTEAO has a charge-off rate of 0.0% across 47 loans, meaning 0.0% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many HTEAO franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, HTEAO has 144 total units in the United States, including 131 franchised units and 13 company-owned units. 42 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is HTEAO a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates HTEAO as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 81 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent HTEAO, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.