Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Hallmark Homecare logo

Hallmark Homecare Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Senior CareNevadaFranchising since 2019
AStrongest tierStrongest tier79/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$110K – $135K
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
0.0%
on 13 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01141FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent86%
Manager-run OKYes: Exclusive territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Hallmark Homecare is a senior care franchise that recruits and places caregivers for in-home, non-medical elder care under a direct-hire model. Franchisees run local agencies, matching caregivers with families and managing client relationships.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Hallmark Homecare franchise requires a total initial investment of $110K – $135K, including a $60K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. The 2026 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. SBA 7(a) loans show a 0.0% charge-off rate across 13 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: 2026 filing · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - the current year's filing

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 6 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$110K – $135K
56th pct Senior Care
Avg gross sales
N/A
Per franchisee, not per outletOutlet subset
Royalty
6.0%
54th pct Senior Care
Units
59
62nd pct Senior Care
SBA charge-off
0.0%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Senior Care · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$110K – $135K
Median $137K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$60K – $60K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$40K – $55K
Median $38K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 5.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
7.0% of rev
Median 7.0%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
0.0%
13 loans · Median 3.9%
below median ↓, better than category
System Size
59 units
Median 25 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
15.3%
Median 2.1%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Exclusive
No other outlet of the brand may open inside it
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Senior Care median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $110K – $135K including a $60K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSItem 19 shows individual income statements and KPIs (e.g. Average Revenue/Client/Month, Average Billable Rate/Hour) for 9 named "Represented Franchisees" selected from the top-performing 50th percentile of the system, not a statistical average/median/range across the full franchisee base, so no whole-system avg/median/high/low figures are disclosed.
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 79/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 0.0% across 13 loans (well below the franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +23 franchised outlets in the latest year (32 opened, 9 closed); 9 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 136.0% CAGR over 3 years with 59 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Hallmark Homecare, LLC
Parent company
Hallmark Homecare, Inc.
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
Predecessor
Hallmark Homecare, Inc.
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Steve Everhart
CEO experience
25 yrs
Years in role or industry
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
Nevada
HQ
774 Mays Blvd, Suite 10-297, Incline Village, Nevada 89451
Auditor
Edward A. Rose, Jr., CPA, PC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$5.8M
vs $3.8M prior year

Overview

About

CEO
Steve Everhart
Headquarters
Nevada
Founded
2011
FDD year
2026
States available
16

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 11% below the typical senior care franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$110K – $135KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$59,500Verified — printed on page 13 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund1.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$40K – $55K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown9 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Franchise Fee - One Protected Territory$60K$60K
Franchise Fee - Two to Five Protected Territories——
Equipment and Supplies$2K$4K
Initial Marketing$3K$6K
Travel and Living Expenses During Training$2K$2K
Miscellaneous Opening Costs$1K$2K
Professional Fees$500$3K
Insurance$3K$4K
Additional Funds - 3 Months$40K$55K
Total initial investment$110K$135K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$110K – $135K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$40K – $55K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$60K – $60K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
6.0%
Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Hallmark Homecare: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund1.0% of gross sales
Training fee$2K
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$0
Total fee load7.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size9 franchisees

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for Hallmark Homecare is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Hallmark Homecare unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $110K–$135K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $40K–$55K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$170K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Item 19 shows individual income statements and KPIs (e.g. Average Revenue/Client/Month, Average Billable Rate/Hour) for 9 named "Represented Franchisees" selected from the top-performing 50th percentile of the system, not a statistical average/median/range across the full franchisee base, so no whole-system avg/median/high/low figures are disclosed.

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
9 franchisees
vs category median 22 · small
Range (low → high)
$342K→$2.9MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 44 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
6 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank56th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank54th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank62th
vs Senior Care peers
Risk score rank18th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 79 Senior Care brands

Showing the headline figures — all 129 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.0% (near the Senior Care median).

Disclosure

Item 19 reports outlet revenue, but not in a form that yields a per-outlet average we can compare across brands.

Operator retention

System expanding at 136.0% CAGR over 3 years across 59 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Senior Care medians

How Hallmark Homecare Compares

Metric
Hallmark Homecare
Category median
vs median
Investment
$122K
$137Kmiddle half $110K–$185K · n=78
Below median, better than category
Revenue
N/A
$1.1Mmiddle half $796K–$1.4M · n=31
Not compared

Per franchisee, not per outlet - the category median is per-outlet only, so no comparison is shown

Unit Count
59
25middle half 6–172 · n=78
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Senior Care brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units59Verified — printed on page 47 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+136.0% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate15.3% (caution)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
59
Opened
32
Last reporting year
Closed
9
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
15.3%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+136.0%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+136.0%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
2
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
9
0.15 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
27
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Ceased ops
11.1%
Units that stopped operating
2023
25
Franchised units
2024
36+11
Franchised units
2025
59+23
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 20 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 20 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

41 current owners across 20 states.

  • FL 5
  • GA 5
  • TX 5
  • CA 3
  • KY 2
  • MI 2
  • NC 2
  • NY 2
  • OH 2
  • PA 2
  • VA 2
  • AL 1
  • +8 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

Growth insight

Fast growth in a small system. Newer franchisors expanding quickly may not yet have the support infrastructure of larger systems.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

A
SBA Lending Health
Excellent SBA lending record · 0.0% charge-off
Total loans
13
Loan volume
$1.6M
Median loan
$130K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
0.0%
on 13 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
100.0%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
6
Defaults
0
Typical loan rate
10.4%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
7.5%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
54
3.4 per loan
Lender concentration
31%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 92% went to startups / new businesses, 8% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in home health care services, franchised businesses charge off at 7.5% vs 11.5% for independents — franchising is associated with 35% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Hallmark Homecare franchisees

First Bank of the Lake4 loans0.0%
United Midwest Savings Bank National Association3 loans—
Northwest Bank2 loans—

Showing 3 of 6 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Hallmark Homecare from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.0%
Avg SBA guarantee
74%
Avg interest rate
10.37%
Lender concentration
30.8%
Job velocity
3.4 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
5.7%
NAICS 621610
Jobs supported
54

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 31% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1First Bank of the Lake4$625K0.0%
2United Midwest Savings Bank National Association3$380KN/A
3Northwest Bank2$155KN/A
4The Huntington National Bank2$210KN/A
5Readycap Lending, LLC1$163KN/A
6Union Bank and Trust Company1$75KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
NENebraska30--
VAVirginia30--
FLFlorida20--
ALAlabama10--
AZArizona10--
NCNorth Carolina10--
OHOhio100.0%
TXTexas10--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2023
2
2024
4
2025
7

Borrower profile

Startup10 (77%)
New (< 2 yr)2 (15%)
Existing (2+ yr)1 (8%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

With a 0.0% charge-off rate across 13 loans, banks have historically viewed this brand favorably for lending.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 0.0% — 100% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off0.0% · 13 loans
Verdict score79/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier79Verdict score 79/100

Moderate-to-caution risk profile: explosive growth trajectory lacks financial transparency, royalty floor structure penalizes smaller territories, and homecare regulatory complexity creates hidden compliance risks.

High confidence±4 pts
7583

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (plaintiff).

Franchisor sued a former franchisee (Randmar, LLC) and related parties in Florida (Nov. 2025) for breach of franchise agreement, non-compete/confidentiality violations, tortious interference, and unjust enrichment; resolved Feb. 2026 by a Consent Order and Stipulated Injunction (no adjudication of liability).

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Edward A. Rose, Jr., CPA, PC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $5.8MYr 2: $3.8MNon-royalty: $0.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: No
  • Restricted to system-approved products: No
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 79 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINOR44% YoY unit growth is exceptionally high and may indicate unsustainable expansion, market saturation risk, or inflated recruitment numbers
  2. 02MINORRoyalty structure has $500/territory minimum floor which could exceed 6% on low-revenue territories, creating profitability squeeze for smaller operators
  3. 03MEDNo litigation disclosed but homecare franchises face inherent liability exposure (worker safety, client care incidents, wage/hour compliance) — absence of disclosure is itself concerning

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 129 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 7.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryExclusive (favorable vs category)
Initial training74 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeExclusive territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹYes
Territory population250,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ20 mi
Right of first refusalℹNo
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawNevada
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

Franchisor sued a former franchisee (Randmar, LLC) and related parties in Florida (Nov. 2025) for breach of franchise agreement, non-compete/confidentiality violations, tortious interference, and unjust enrichment; resolved Feb. 2026 by a Consent Order and Stipulated Injunction (no adjudication of liability).

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
31 hrs
On-the-job training
16 hrs
Training location
Level 1: remote/self-study; Level 2: in-person, typically Irvine, CA
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
3 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
QuickBooks Online
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: QuickBooks Online

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

41 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 41 contacts · $49
Free preview
(412) 334-••••PA
Unlock all 41 contacts
(414) 406-••••WI
(619) 200-••••CA
(770) 584-••••GA
(330) 503-••••OH

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Hallmark Homecare franchise?

The total investment to open a Hallmark Homecare franchise ranges from $110K – $135K, with an initial franchise fee of $60K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Hallmark Homecare franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the Hallmark Homecare FDD discloses outlet figures from $342K to $2.9M but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns Hallmark Homecare?

Hallmark Homecare is franchised by Hallmark Homecare, LLC. Its parent company is Hallmark Homecare, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Hallmark Homecare FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Hallmark Homecare FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Hallmark Homecare's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Hallmark Homecare has a charge-off rate of 0.0% across 13 loans, meaning 0.0% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Hallmark Homecare franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Hallmark Homecare has 59 total units in the United States, including 59 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 32 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Hallmark Homecare a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Hallmark Homecare as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 79 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Hallmark Homecare, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Senior Care franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Senior Care category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.