Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Fresh Coat logo

Fresh Coat Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Home ServicesOHFranchising since 2005
AStrongest tierStrongest tier81/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$86K – $125K
Disclosed sales
$752K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Limited · 22 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00999FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent95%
Manager-run OKYes: Exclusive territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Fresh Coat is a home-services franchise providing residential and commercial interior and exterior painting. Franchisees run a sales-and-crew operation handling estimates, scheduling, and projects in a protected territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Fresh Coat franchise requires a total initial investment of $86K – $125K, including a $55K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average revenue per territory was $752K. This franchisor reports Item 19 per territory rather than per outlet, so the figure is not comparable with per-outlet averages[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: 2026 filing · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - the current year's filing

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$86K – $125K
25th pct Home Services
Avg gross sales
$752K
Per territory, not per outlet
Royalty
6.0%
21st pct Home Services
Units
182
74th pct Home Services
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Home Services · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$86K – $125K
Median $168K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$55K – $55K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$21K – $43K
Median $29K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$752K
Median $587K
Per territory, not per outlet
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 6.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited · 22 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 22 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units
System Size
182 units
Median 47 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
15.4%
Median 4.3%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Exclusive
No other outlet of the brand may open inside it
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
6 cases
Review carefully

Green = favorable by >10% vs Home Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $86K – $125K including a $55K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage revenue per territory of $752K/year (median $653K). Averaged per territory, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures.
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 81/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -5 franchised outlets in the latest year (23 opened, 28 closed); 1 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • FLAG13 units terminated last reporting year (7.1% of the system). Ask existing franchisees why.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
F.C. Franchising Systems, Inc.
CEO title
President
Lisa Hudson
Incorporated in
OH
HQ
4755 Lake Forest Drive, Suite 100, Cincinnati, Ohio 45242
Auditor
Clark, Schaefer, Hackett & Co.
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$6.5M
vs $6.9M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Overview

About

CEO
Lisa Hudson
Headquarters
OH
Founded
2005
FDD year
2026
States available
32

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 37% below the typical home services franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$86K – $125KNot cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Franchise fee$54,900Verified — printed on page 11 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 12 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$21K – $43K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown11 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee$55K$55K
Furniture and Equipment$0$1K
Computer System$1K$3K
Travel & living expenses while training$3K$5K
Initial Rent, Telephone, Bank, Licensing Fees, and Other Deposits$0$2K
Insurance$3K$8K
Grand Opening Promotion$3K$4K
Compliance with regulations$450$1K
Additional Funds - 3 Months$21K$43K
Monthly Office Rental Payment$0$1K
Vehicle$0$3K
Total initial investment$86K$125K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$86K – $125K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$21K – $43K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$55K – $55K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Fresh Coat: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$499
Transfer fee$13K
Renewal fee$0
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 28% above the home services norm.

Avg gross sales$752K

Averaged per territory, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 35 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$653KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 35 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typequartile and cumulative gr…
Sample size62 territories

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Fresh Coat until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$138K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Fresh Coat unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per territory, per year (NOT per outlet)FDD
FDD Item 19 reports $751,964 per territory — not per outlet. Every other input below is for ONE unit; replace this with a single-unit figure before relying on the ROIC.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $86K–$125K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $21K–$43K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$138K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Averaged per territory, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Avg gross sales
$752K
Per territory, per year — not per outlet
Median gross sales
$653K
Per territory, not per outlet

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
quartile and cumulative gross revenue
Sample size
62 territories
vs category median 32
Range (low → high)
$107K→$3.0MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 35 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$291K→$1.5M
Bottom 25% → top 25%, per territory
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank25th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank21th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank74th
vs Home Services peers
Risk score rank6th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 319 Home Services brands

Showing the headline figures — all 106 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

The average territory generates $752K/year in gross sales.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Home Services median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System roughly stable (+4.6% 3-year CAGR) with 182 units.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Home Services medians

How Fresh Coat Compares

Metric
Fresh Coat
Category median
vs median
Investment
$106K
$168Kmiddle half $122K–$232K · n=283
Below median, better than category
Revenue
$752K
$587Kmiddle half $376K–$1.3M · n=79
Not compared

Per territory, not per outlet - the category median is per-outlet only, so no comparison is shown

Unit Count
182
47middle half 14–137 · n=283
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Home Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units182Verified — printed on page 37 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+4.6% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate15.4% (caution)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
182
Opened
23
Last reporting year
Closed
28
Terminated
13
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
1
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
15.4%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
Outlier
Reported value implausible. See FDD Item 20
Net growth (3-yr)
+4.6%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+4.6%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
13
Not renewed
1
Transferred
8
Reacquired
7
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
1
0.01 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
28
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
3.2%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Termination rate
4.3%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
12.8%
Units that stopped operating
2023
174
Franchised units
2024
187+13
Franchised units
2025
182-5
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 25 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 25 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

75 current owners across 26 states.

  • FL 15
  • GA 8
  • NC 6
  • CA 5
  • IL 5
  • CO 4
  • AZ 3
  • MA 3
  • MD 3
  • AR 2
  • DE 2
  • LA 2
  • +14 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
22
Loan volume
$4.2M
Median loan
$102K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Limited · 22 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 22 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Limited · 22 loans
5-yr charge-off
Limited · 22 loans
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
17
Defaults
2
Typical loan rate
7.7%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
26.5%
n=629 loans
Jobs supported
117
2.8 per loan
Lender concentration
9%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 50% went to startups / new businesses, 50% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in painting and wall covering contractors, franchised businesses charge off at 26.5% vs 21.7% for independents — franchising is associated with 22% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Fresh Coat franchisees

Stearns Bank National Association2 loans0.0%
ESL FCU2 loans100.0%
KeyBank National Association2 loans—

Showing 3 of 17 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Fresh Coat from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.6%
Avg SBA guarantee
75%
Avg interest rate
7.74%
Avg chargeoff amount
$13K
Lender concentration
9.1%
Job velocity
2.8 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
24.0%
NAICS 238320
Jobs supported
117

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 9% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Stearns Bank National Association2$153K0.0%
2ESL FCU2$77K100.0%
3KeyBank National Association2$1.2MN/A
4United Midwest Savings Bank National Association2$300KN/A
5The Huntington National Bank2$285KN/A
6Falcon National Bank1$10K0.0%
7Celtic Bank Corporation1$70K0.0%
8Texas Capital Bank1$424KN/A
9Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company1$25K100.0%
10First Savings Bank1$75K0.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
OHOhio400.0%
FLFlorida30--
TXTexas30--
NYNew York21100.0%
ARArkansas10--
CACalifornia100.0%
GAGeorgia100.0%
KSKansas10--
MDMaryland11100.0%
MNMinnesota100.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2014
1
2015
2
2016
1
2017
2
2018
1
2019
2
2021
3
2022
3
2024
2
2025
4
2026
1

Borrower profile

Startup8 (50%)
Existing (2+ yr)4 (25%)
Unanswered2 (13%)
Ownership change2 (13%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offLimited · 22 loans
Verdict score81/100 (higher is better)
Litigation6 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier81Verdict score 81/100

Fresh Coat presents elevated risk due to recurring regulatory non-disclosure violations, opaque profitability data, aggressive franchisor enforcement history, and modest growth trajectory—proceed only after intensive franchisee validation.

Why this reads harsher than the A grade: the grade weighs financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency across the whole filing, while this summary lists individual flags without that weighting. The flags are worth checking with current owners; neither is investment advice.

High confidence±4 pts
7785

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Two enforcement actions by franchisor against former franchisees (one settled for $165,216; one arbitration dismissed upon transfer); two consent orders with California DFPI (officer bankruptcy non-disclosure and CPA registration issue); Virginia settlement order regarding officer bankruptcy non-disclosure; and affiliate Virginia settlement order (Growth Coach officer bankruptcy)

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Clark, Schaefer, Hackett & Co.

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $6.5MYr 2: $6.9MNon-royalty: $1.6M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: No
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 81 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORMultiple regulatory settlements involving non-disclosure of officer bankruptcies (Virginia, California, Virginia affiliate) suggesting potential governance/transparency issues
  2. 02HIGHAggressive litigation posture: two franchisor-initiated enforcement actions against franchisees signal potential relationship friction
  3. 03MINORCPA registration compliance violation in California indicates internal controls/compliance gaps
  4. 04MINORModest unit growth (7.5% YoY) in a 187-unit system suggests market saturation or plateauing demand

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 106 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryExclusive (favorable vs category)
Initial training40 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeExclusive territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹYes
Territory population175,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeNo
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ15 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ22
Curable defaultsℹ6
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationCincinnati, Ohio
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawOhio
Litigation count6
View Item 3 litigation summary

Two enforcement actions by franchisor against former franchisees (one settled for $165,216; one arbitration dismissed upon transfer); two consent orders with California DFPI (officer bankruptcy non-disclosure and CPA registration issue); Virginia settlement order regarding officer bankruptcy non-disclosure; and affiliate Virginia settlement order (Growth Coach officer bankruptcy)

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
40 hrs
On-the-job training
0 hrs
Training location
Cincinnati, Ohio (corporate headquarters)
Ongoing training
Optional
Time to open
1 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

75 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 75 contacts · $49
Free preview
(786) 395-••••FL
Unlock all 75 contacts
(641) 752-••••IA
(734) 358-••••NY
(858) 442-••••CA
(215) 239-••••FL

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Fresh Coat franchise?

The total investment to open a Fresh Coat franchise ranges from $86K – $125K, with an initial franchise fee of $55K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Fresh Coat franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Fresh Coat FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $752K. The median is $653K. Important context: Averaged per territory, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Fresh Coat?

Fresh Coat is franchised by F.C. Franchising Systems, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Fresh Coat FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Fresh Coat FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Fresh Coat's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Fresh Coat (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Fresh Coat franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Fresh Coat has 182 total units in the United States, including 182 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 23 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Fresh Coat a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Fresh Coat as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 81 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Fresh Coat, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Home Services franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Home Services category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.