Famous Dave’s Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026
- Investment
- $1.3M – $2.9M
- Disclosed sales
- $2.9M
- gross sales, not profit
- SBA charge-off
- Limited · 15 loans
Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records
Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology
Famous Dave's is a barbecue franchise serving smoked ribs, brisket, chicken, and signature sauces via full-service, counter, and ghost-kitchen formats. Franchisees run restaurants managing smoking, service, and staffing.
FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026
A Famous Dave’s franchise requires a total initial investment of $1.3M – $2.9M, including a $35K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $2.9M[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →
Sources, dates and evidence
FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months
Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.
Overview
- Investment
- $1.3M – $2.9M
- 35th pct Service Resta…
- Avg gross sales
- $2.9M
- Net sales13th pct Service Resta…
- Royalty
- 5.0%
- 8th pct Service Resta…
- Units
- 100
- 31st pct Service Resta…
- SBA charge-off
- N/A
Quick verdict · Full-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers
Green = favorable by >10% vs Full-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)
Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology
Bottom line
- COSTTotal investment $1.3M – $2.9M including a $35K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
- RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $2.9M/year (median $2.8M).
- RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 50/100 (higher is better).
- GROWTHNegative: net -6 franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 8 closed); 10 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
- LEGAL16 litigation matters disclosed in Item 3, higher than typical. Review the summary for patterns (franchisor-initiated vs. franchisee-initiated).
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Corporate structure & franchisor financials
- Legal entity
- Famous Dave's of America, Inc.
- Parent company
- BBQ Holdings, Inc.
- FDD Item 1, page 10 of the 2026 FDD
- Ultimate parent
- MTY Food Group, Inc.
- FDD Item 1, page 10 of the 2026 FDD
- Predecessor
- The Extreme Pita Franchising USA, Inc. (predecessor in interest to MTY Franchising USA, Inc.)
- Prior franchisor entity
- CEO title
- Chief Executive Officer (of MTY, parent)
- Eric Lefebvre
- Incorporated in
- Minnesota
- HQ
- 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite 100, Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343-4164
- Auditor
- PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)
- Audited financials
- Franchisor revenue
- $604.2M
- vs $597.5M prior year
Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 10
26 other brands on this site name MTY Food Group, Inc. as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.
- Barrio QueenC
- BlimpieD
- Chicken Strips and DipsD
- Cold Stone CreameryC
- Extreme PitaF
- Ginger Sushi + Poke ShopC
- GrabbagreenC
- Great SteakC
- Kahala Coffee TradersB
- La DiperieB
- Manchu WOKB
- Maui WowiD
- Mucho BurritoB
- NrGize Lifestyle CafeB
- Papa Murphy'sA
- PinkberryB
- Planet SmoothieC
- Samurai Sam’s Teriyaki GrillB
- Sauce Pizza / WineD
- Surf City SqueezeD
- TacoTimeC
- Thai ExpressD
- Village InnD
- Wetzel’s PretzelsA
- +2 more
Portfolio: MTY Food Group
Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2026 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.
Overview
About
- CEO
- Eric Lefebvre
- Headquarters
- Minnesota
- Founded
- 1994
- FDD year
- 2026
- States available
- 26
Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?
Entry cost runs 204% above the typical full-service restaurants franchise.
Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7
FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing
Initial investment breakdown
| Cost component | Low | High |
|---|---|---|
| Initial franchise fee | $35K | $35K |
| Working capital (3–6 mo) | $5K | $10K |
| Equipment, build-out, other | $1.2M | $2.8M |
| Total initial investment | $1.3M | $2.9M |
Source: Famous Dave’s 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.
Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate
The Vitals
- Total investment
- $1.3M – $2.9M
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Liquid capital req'd
- $5K – $10K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Franchise fee
- $35K – $35K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Royalty
- 5.0%
- typical 6–8%
- Ad fund
- 1.0%
- typical 3–5%
- Total fee load
- 6.5%
- vs 9–13% typical
Ongoing fees · Item 6
| Fee | Amount |
|---|---|
| Royalty | 5.0% of gross sales |
| Marketing / ad fund | 1.0% |
| Transfer fee | $5K |
| Renewal fee | $23K |
| Total fee load | 6.5% of rev |
A 6.5% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.
What do units actually make?
Average unit sales run 82% above the full-service restaurants norm.
Reported as net sales, not gross sales
Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19
Single-unit · not modelled
Returns at a glance
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Famous Dave’s until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.
—
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
Total invested capital · disclosed
$2.1M
Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.
ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
What one unit earns on your invested capital
Model A · Single-Unit Return
Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.
Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.
Returns model · single-unit ROIC
What would one Famous Dave’s unit return on the cash you put in?
Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.
—
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
What 25 units return when you use SBA financing
Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition
Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).
This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.
What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.
These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.
Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD
Financial Performance
Reported as net sales, not gross sales
- Avg gross sales
- $2.9M
- Per unit, per year
- Median gross sales
- $2.8M
Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.
- Item 19 type
- historical actual
- Sample size
- 59 outlets
- vs category median 18 · large
- Range (low → high)
- $471K→$7.5MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 73 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
- Cohort dispersion (min → max)
- Reporting year
- 2025
- Fiscal year the figures cover
- Source filing
- FDD 2026
- Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
- Transparency
- 4 / 10
- vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Compared against 801 Full-Service Restaurants brands
Operator outlook
What the numbers say
Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.
Unit economics
Average unit generates $2.9M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.4x.
Fee burden
Total ongoing fee load of 6.5% (near the Full-Service Restaurants median).
Disclosure
Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.
Operator retention
System contracting at -23.1% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.
Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.
vs Full-Service Restaurants medians
How Famous Dave’s Compares
Category median of published Full-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.
Is the system healthy?
Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20
Unit growth
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
- Total units
- 100
- Opened
- 0
- Last reporting year
- Closed
- 8
- Terminated
- 0
- Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
- Non-renewed
- 0
- Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
- Turnover rate
- 8.0%
- Company-owned
- 30
- Corporate units in the system
- % franchised
- 70%
- vs corporate-owned
- Net growth (3-yr)
- -23.1%
- Net unit change over 3 years
- 3-yr CAGR
- -23.1%
- Compounded over last 3 years
Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers
- Terminated
- 0
- Not renewed
- 0
- Transferred
- 1
- Reacquired
- 0
- Franchisor bought back
- Signed, not yet open
- 10
- 0.10 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
- Projected new
- 5
- Franchisor's next-year forecast
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 25 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.
Available to sell in · Item 12
- California
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Michigan
- New York
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Virginia
- Washington
- Wisconsin
States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).
Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list
76 current owners across 25 states.
- CA 13
- TX 10
- NV 6
- IL 4
- MI 4
- ID 3
- MD 3
- MN 3
- MT 3
- VA 3
- WA 3
- WI 3
- +13 more states
Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 33 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.
A system losing more than 10% of its units year-over-year is a red flag. Check whether closures are concentrated in specific regions.
SBA loan performance
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
- Total loans
- 15
- Loan volume
- $19.3M
- Median loan
- $787K
- 50th percentile
- Charge-off rate
- Limited · 15 loans
- Limited SBA coverage: 15 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units
Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated
- Repayment rate (PIF)
- Limited · 15 loans
- 5-yr charge-off
- Limited · 15 loans
- Loans approved 2021+
- Active lenders
- 14
- Defaults
- 1
- Typical loan rate
- 8.3%
- avg rate to borrowers
- vs industry
- N/A
- NAICS 7225
- Jobs supported
- 1,044
- 5.4 per loan
- Lender concentration
- 13%
- top lender's share
Borrower mix: 33% went to startups / new businesses, 67% to established operators
Top lenders financing Famous Dave’s franchisees
Showing 3 of 14 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.
Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.
Lender network · 7(a) + 504
SBA Lending Report
Full lending analysis for Famous Dave’s from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.
- Principal loss rate
- 20.5%
- Avg SBA guarantee
- 68%
- Avg interest rate
- 8.25%
- Avg chargeoff amount
- $3.9M
- Lender concentration
- 13.3%
- Job velocity
- 5.4 per $100K
- Jobs supported
- 1,044
Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 13% of loans
| # | Lender | Loans | Volume | Default % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | N/A | N/A | |
| 2 | 1 | N/A | N/A | |
| 3 | 1 | N/A | N/A | |
| 4 | 1 | N/A | N/A | |
| 5 | 1 | N/A | N/A |
Geographic failure vector
| State | Loans | Defaults | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| MNMinnesota | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| SCSouth Carolina | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| AZArizona | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| GAGeorgia | 2 | 0 | -- |
| FLFlorida | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| KSKansas | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| MOMissouri | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| NJNew Jersey | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| TXTexas | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
SBA 7(a) lending trend
Borrower profile
Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict
What could kill this investment?
Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21
Risk analysis
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21
Risk & Legal
Famous Dave's presents HIGH RISK due to contracting unit base (-12% YoY), substantial litigation history involving franchise law violations, absence of financial transparency, lack of territorial protection, and unfavorable unit economics amid system decline.
Why this reads harsher than the B grade: the grade weighs financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency across the whole filing, while this summary lists individual flags without that weighting. The flags are worth checking with current owners; neither is investment advice.
Litigation (Item 3)
Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).
Numerous historical (mostly 2012-2021, now concluded) disputes involving Famous Dave's and MTY-affiliated brands (Extreme Pita, Kahala, SweetFrog, Papa Murphy's, Wetzel's Pretzels, VI BrandCo) including franchisee misrepresentation/FIPA claims, breach of contract, trademark infringement post-termination continued use, and state franchise-registration consent orders (Maryland, Virginia, New York). Three new suits filed by Kahala Franchising against franchisees in FY2025 (breach of contract, trademark infringement). No bankruptcy required to be disclosed for Famous Dave's itself.
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None disclosed
Audited financials (Item 21)
Yes · PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)
Franchisor revenue (Item 21)
Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)
Item 21 attaches Exhibit B-1, the audited consolidated financial statements of the franchisor's parent and guarantor MTY Franchising USA, Inc. for the fiscal years ended November 30, 2025 and 2024 (PricewaterhouseCoopers), in thousands of US dollars; MTY guarantees the franchisor's obligations (Exhibit B-2). FY2025 revenue $604,239,000; net income $30,677,000; total assets $1,447,070,000; total liabilities $1,176,013,000; stockholder's equity $271,057,000. Famous Dave's of America, Inc.'s own statements are not included.
ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.
Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16
- Franchisor sells you products: No
- Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
- Must buy proprietary products: Yes
- Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
- Can negotiate own supplier terms: No
Score breakdown · what drove the 50 / 100 verdict
- 01MINORDeclining unit count: 12% YoY contraction (116 units) suggests system-wide performance deterioration or franchisee exits
- 02HIGHSignificant litigation history: 16 concluded legal actions involving franchise law violations and misrepresentations indicate regulatory/compliance concerns and potential franchisor credibility issues
- 03MINORNo territory protection: Franchisees lack exclusive market rights, enabling cannibalization and direct franchisor competition
- 04MINOR5% royalty on declining revenues: Franchisor revenue shrinking while franchisees bear fixed costs in contracting system
- 05MED10-year commitment term: Long lock-in period with limited exit flexibility in deteriorating franchise environment
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
What are you signing up for?
Ongoing fees run about 6.5% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.
Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17
FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
| Initial term | 10 years |
|---|---|
| Renewal term | 10 years |
| Allowed renewalsℹ | 1 |
| Territory type | No territory protection |
| Protected territory | No |
| Exclusive territoryℹ | No |
| Online sales rightsℹ | Restricted |
| Franchisor can compete | Yes |
| Hire a manager? | Allowed |
| Owner-operator | Required |
| Non-compete (years)ℹ | 1 year |
| Non-compete (miles)ℹ | 5 mi |
| Right of first refusalℹ | Yes |
| Transfer requires consent | Yes |
| Termination notice | 14 days |
| Curable defaultsℹ | 4 |
| Mandatory arbitration | Yes |
| Arbitration location | Minneapolis, Minnesota (per California addendum reference); general dispute resolution per Article 23 of Franchise Agreement, governed by state where restaurant is located |
| Jury trial waiver | Yes |
| Governing law | State where the Restaurant is located (except where federal law applies) |
| Litigation count | 16 |
View Item 3 litigation summary
Numerous historical (mostly 2012-2021, now concluded) disputes involving Famous Dave's and MTY-affiliated brands (Extreme Pita, Kahala, SweetFrog, Papa Murphy's, Wetzel's Pretzels, VI BrandCo) including franchisee misrepresentation/FIPA claims, breach of contract, trademark infringement post-termination continued use, and state franchise-registration consent orders (Maryland, Virginia, New York). Three new suits filed by Kahala Franchising against franchisees in FY2025 (breach of contract, trademark infringement). No bankruptcy required to be disclosed for Famous Dave's itself.
Items 10, 11
Training & Operations
- Classroom training
- 75 hrs
- On-the-job training
- 300 hrs
- Training location
- Certified training location designated by Famous Dave's
- Ongoing training
- Required
- Time to open
- 24 mo
- From signing to launch
- Site selection
- Franchisee selects, Famous Dave's reviews/approves via Site Review Report and "no objection" letter
- Franchisor financing
- Offered
- Item 10
- POS system
- integrated front-of-house and back-of-house POS system
- Operating tech stack
Items 5 & 11
Franchisor Support
Technology: integrated front-of-house and back-of-house POS system
Item 20 · call current owners
Franchisee Contacts
109 owners to call
Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20
Frequently asked questions
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does it cost to open a Famous Dave’s franchise?
The total investment to open a Famous Dave’s franchise ranges from $1.3M – $2.9M, with an initial franchise fee of $35K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).
What do Famous Dave’s franchise owners earn?
According to Item 19 of the Famous Dave’s FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $2.9M. The median is $2.8M. Important context: Reported as net sales, not gross sales. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.
Who owns Famous Dave’s?
Famous Dave’s is franchised by Famous Dave's of America, Inc.. Its parent company is BBQ Holdings, Inc.. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is MTY Food Group, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.
What is Item 19 in the Famous Dave’s FDD?
The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Famous Dave’s FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.
What is Famous Dave’s's franchise failure rate?
SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Famous Dave’s (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.
How many Famous Dave’s franchise locations are there?
As of their most recent FDD filing, Famous Dave’s has 100 total units in the United States, including 70 franchised units and 30 company-owned units.
Is Famous Dave’s a good franchise to buy?
FranchiseVerdict rates Famous Dave’s as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 50 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.
Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.
For franchisors
Are you the franchisor?
If you represent Famous Dave’s, you can request corrections or provide updated information.
Other Full-Service Restaurants franchises
Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Full-Service Restaurants category
Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.