Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
East of Chicago Pizza logo

East of Chicago Pizza Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsOHFranchising since 2010
BAbove averageAbove average56/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$218K – $483K
Disclosed sales
$672K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
18.5%
on 70 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00824FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent95%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

East of Chicago Pizza is a pizza restaurant franchise offering dine-in, carryout, and delivery. Franchisees run the restaurants, managing food prep, staffing, and local marketing within a protected territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A East of Chicago Pizza franchise requires a total initial investment of $218K – $483K, including a $20K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $672K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 18.5% charge-off rate across 70 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$218K – $483K
29th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$672K
10th pct Service Resta…
Royalty
5.0%
12th pct Service Resta…
Units
68
71st pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
18.5%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$218K – $483K
Median $486K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$20K – $20K
Median $35K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$20K – $30K
Median $33K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$672K
Median $975K
below median ↓, worse than category
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
18.5%
70 loans · Median 14.3%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
68 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
1.6%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $218K – $483K including a $20K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $672K/year (median $682K).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 56/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 18.5% across 70 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +3 franchised outlets in the latest year (2 opened, 1 closed); 2 signed but not yet open (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
East of Chicago Pizza, LLC
Predecessor
East of Chicago Pizza Company
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
President
Anthony Collins
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
OH
HQ
121 West High Street, 12th Floor, Lima, OH 45801
Auditor
Reese CPA LLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$4.6M
vs $4.6M prior year

Overview

About

CEO
Anthony Collins
Headquarters
OH
Founded
2010
FDD year
2025
States available
6

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 28% below the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$218K – $483KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 17 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$20,000Verified — printed on page 10 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 11 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund3.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 11 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$20K – $30K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

East of Chicago Pizza: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$20K$20K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$20K$30K
Equipment, build-out, other$178K$433K
Total initial investment$218K$483K

Source: East of Chicago Pizza 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$218K – $483K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$20K – $30K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$20K – $20K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
3.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

East of Chicago Pizza: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund3.0% of gross sales
Training fee$2K
Transfer fee$5K
Renewal fee$10K
Inventory (initial)$6K – $10K
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 31% below the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$672KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 39 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$682KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 39 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typehistoric sales
Sample size62 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for East of Chicago Pizza until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$375K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one East of Chicago Pizza unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $671,999 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $218K–$483K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $20K–$30K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$375K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$672K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$682K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
historic sales
Sample size
62 outlets
vs category median 19 · large
Range (low → high)
$176K→$1.4MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 39 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank10th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank29th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank12th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank71th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank35th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 141 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $672K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.9x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Quick-Service Restaurants median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 6.7% CAGR over 3 years across 68 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How East of Chicago Pizza Compares

Metric
East of Chicago Pizza
Category median
vs median
Investment
$350K
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Below median, better than category
Revenue
$672K
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
68
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units68Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 40 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
3-yr growth+6.7% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate1.6% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
68
Opened
2
Last reporting year
Closed
1
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
1.6%
Company-owned
2
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
97%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+6.7%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+6.7%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Signed, not yet open
2
0.03 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
3
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
7.6%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Ceased ops
1.5%
Units that stopped operating
2022
60
Franchised units
2023
63+3
Franchised units
2024
66+3
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 6 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 6 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

66 current owners across 6 states.

  • OH 50
  • IN 5
  • FL 4
  • NY 3
  • WV 3
  • TN 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

D
SBA Lending Health
Below-average SBA lending record · 18.5% charge-off
Total loans
70
Loan volume
$9.4M
Median loan
$100K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
18.5%
on 70 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
81.1%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
19
Defaults
10
Typical loan rate
8.5%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
21.5%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
395
5.3 per loan
Lender concentration
50%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 0% went to startups / new businesses, 100% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in limited-service restaurants, franchised businesses charge off at 21.5% vs 25.0% for independents — franchising is associated with 14% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

East of Chicago Pizza charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
East of Chicago Pizza charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 9 vintages from 1995 to 2008. Rates range from 0.0% to 40.0%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%'95'97'99'03'08

Top lenders financing East of Chicago Pizza franchisees

The Huntington National Bank29 loans20.8%
PNC Bank, National Association7 loans0.0%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association5 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 19 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
1
Loan volume
$157K
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
4

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for East of Chicago Pizza from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
13.6%
Avg SBA guarantee
73%
Avg interest rate
8.47%
Avg chargeoff amount
$101K
Lender concentration
50.0%
Job velocity
5.3 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
15.7%
NAICS 722211
Jobs supported
395

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 50% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank29$3.3M20.8%
2PNC Bank, National Association7$762K0.0%
3JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association5$964K0.0%
4Citizens Bank2$205K0.0%
5Sutton Bank2$200K0.0%
6WesBanco Bank, Inc.2$250K50.0%
7Fifth Third Bank1$100K0.0%
8KeyBank National Association1$100K0.0%
9STAR Financial Bank1$150K0.0%
10FirstMerit Community Development Corporation1$140K100.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
OHOhio53816.7%
INIndiana300.0%
FLFlorida11100.0%
KYKentucky11100.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

1995
3
1996
4
1997
5
1998
5
1999
3
2000
2
2001
2
2002
5
2003
6
2004
1
2005
5
2006
2
2007
1
2008
3
2009
1
2010
1
2012
1
2019
2
2024
3
2025
3

Borrower profile

Ownership change5 (63%)
Existing (2+ yr)3 (38%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 18.5% — 15% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off18.5% · 70 loans
Verdict score56/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average56Verdict score 56/100

Stagnant growth, undisclosed profitability, recent competitive litigation, and vague financial metrics create meaningful execution risk for new franchisees.

High confidence±4 pts
5260

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (plaintiff).

East of Chicago Pizza LLC v. EOC Pizza LLC (N.D. Ohio, 2022) - franchisor plaintiff alleging breach of franchise agreement; settled April 2023

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Reese CPA LLC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $4.6MYr 2: $4.6MNon-royalty: $0.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

FY2024 total revenues of $4,602,793 comprise royalty fees $2,095,379, advertising fees $1,275,520, rebate revenue $1,186,107, franchise fees $10,125, and other revenues $35,662. Audited statements for years ended Dec 31, 2024/2023/2022 (Exhibit F). Auditor firm name not present in extracted text (letterhead address: 2580 East Harmony Road, Ste. 301-10, Ft. Collins, CO 80528).

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 56 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORMinimal system growth (1.6% YoY) with only 66 units suggests market saturation or brand weakness
  2. 02MINORNo Item 19 (average net income) disclosure limits ability to assess true profitability despite $674K avg revenue
  3. 03HIGHRecent litigation (2022-2023) involving former franchisee operating competitive business raises IP protection and enforcement concerns
  4. 04MINOR5% royalty on adjusted gross revenues creates ambiguity about what deductions are permitted before royalty calculation

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 141 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training59 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius2 mi
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ5 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationLima, Ohio
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawOH
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

East of Chicago Pizza LLC v. EOC Pizza LLC (N.D. Ohio, 2022) - franchisor plaintiff alleging breach of franchise agreement; settled April 2023

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
12 hrs
On-the-job training
30 hrs
Training location
Corporate Training Facility (Upper Sandusky, Ohio) and open East of Chicago Pizza location
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
80 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Time to open
3 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee with franchisor approval
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

66 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 66 contacts · $49
Free preview
(828) 785-••••FL
Unlock all 66 contacts
(330) 966-••••OH
(304) 592-••••WV
(330) 753-••••OH
(937) 773-••••OH

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a East of Chicago Pizza franchise?

The total investment to open a East of Chicago Pizza franchise ranges from $218K – $483K, with an initial franchise fee of $20K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do East of Chicago Pizza franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the East of Chicago Pizza FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $672K. The median is $682K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns East of Chicago Pizza?

East of Chicago Pizza is franchised by East of Chicago Pizza, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the East of Chicago Pizza FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the East of Chicago Pizza FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is East of Chicago Pizza's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, East of Chicago Pizza has a charge-off rate of 18.5% across 70 loans, meaning 18.5% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many East of Chicago Pizza franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, East of Chicago Pizza has 68 total units in the United States, including 66 franchised units and 2 company-owned units. 2 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is East of Chicago Pizza a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates East of Chicago Pizza as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 56 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent East of Chicago Pizza, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.