Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
City Express by Marriott logo

City Express by Marriott Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

LodgingMDFranchising since 2024
BAbove averageAbove average53/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$2.8M – $4.9M
Disclosed sales
not disclosed
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00546FDD 2026Data QualityStandard71%
Manager-run OKNo: No territory protection

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

City Express by Marriott is a limited-service hotel franchise offering value-priced rooms for business and leisure travelers. Franchisees own and operate the hotels, managing front desk, housekeeping, and revenue.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A City Express by Marriott franchise requires a total initial investment of $2.8M – $4.9M, including a $75K – $100K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. This franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Limited operating history: franchising since 2024. A system this young has fewer than three years of Item 20 outlet history and rarely enough SBA loans for a charge-off rate, so its grade rests on less evidence than an established system's. Read its Item 20 tables and talk to its first franchisees before relying on the grade. Other new franchisors

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored4 of 5 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$2.8M – $4.9M
29th pct Lodging
Avg gross sales
N/A
Royalty
5.0%
3rd pct Lodging
Units
11
22nd pct Lodging
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Lodging · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$2.8M – $4.9M
Median $8.9M
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$75K – $100K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$300K – $500K
Median $312K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
Not disclosed
Franchisor makes none
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
6.5% of rev
Median 8.5%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
11 units
Median 60 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.7%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
None
The franchisor can open or license outlets nearby
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
17 cases
Review carefully

Green = favorable by >10% vs Lodging median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $2.8M – $4.9M including a $75K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSThis franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that.
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 53/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +10 franchised outlets in the latest year (10 opened, 0 closed) (Item 20).
  • LEGAL17 litigation matters disclosed in Item 3, higher than typical. Review the summary for patterns (franchisor-initiated vs. franchisee-initiated).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
MIF, L.L.C.
Parent company
Marriott International, Inc.
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2026 FDD
Predecessor
Hoteles City Express, S.A.B. de C.V. (acquired by Marriott International May 2023)
Prior franchisor entity
Incorporated in
DE
HQ
7750 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20814
Auditor
Ernst & Young LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$147.5M
vs $103.3M prior year

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 9

8 other brands on this site name Marriott International, Inc. as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2026 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Anthony Capuano
Headquarters
MD
Founded
2012
FDD year
2026
States available
0

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 57% below the typical lodging franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$2.8M – $4.9MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 54 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$75,000Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 48 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund1.5%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 36 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$300K – $500K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing

Initial investment breakdown

City Express by Marriott: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$75K$75K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$300K$500K
Equipment, build-out, other$2.4M$4.3M
Total initial investment$2.8M$4.9M

Source: City Express by Marriott 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$2.8M – $4.9M
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$300K – $500K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$75K – $100K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.5%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
6.5%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

City Express by Marriott: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund1.5% of gross sales
Technology fee$0
Training fee$10K
Transfer fee$100K
Total fee load6.5% of rev
ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

City Express by Marriott makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD - a voluntary item under the FTC Franchise Rule - so no unit revenue figures are disclosed. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one City Express by Marriott unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $2.8M–$4.9M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $300K–$500K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$4.2M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

No financial performance representation

This franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that.

Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Showing the headline figures — all 128 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 6.5% — below the Lodging median of 8.5%.

Disclosure

This franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Lodging medians

How City Express by Marriott Compares

Metric
City Express by Marriott
Category median
vs median
Investment
$3.8M
$8.9Mmiddle half $1.2M–$18.3M · n=96
Below median, better than category
Revenue
N/A
$1.4Mmiddle half $1.0M–$1.8M · n=2
N/A
Unit Count
11
60middle half 6–245 · n=126
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Lodging brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units11Verified — printed on page 104 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
11
Opened
10
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Projected new
44
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2023
0
Franchised units
2024
1+1
Franchised units
2025
11+10
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score53/100 (higher is better)
Litigation17 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average53Verdict score 53/100
Low confidence±15 pts
3868

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Multiple matters: (A) 2018 Starwood data security breach MDL and related administrative investigations/regulatory actions in US, UK, Turkey, Canada, Australia; (B) Resort/destination fee investigations and DC lawsuit (settled 2025); (C) Portillo antitrust class action, Segal antitrust class action, Hall negligence ($16M verdict, settled 2025), Marriott v Lucky Cleveland arbitration ($1.95M awarded), SRG v Discover credit card proceeds dispute; (D) Several concluded cases including Rahman Property System Incident (settled), HPT arbitration, two Puerto Rico resort fee suits (settled individually), Cityfront Hotel Associates (settled 2017), Todd Hall (settled).

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Ernst & Young LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $147.5MYr 2: $103.3MNon-royalty: $3.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Financial statements of franchisor MIF, L.L.C. ($ in thousands). FY2025 total revenues of $147,482K comprise gross fee revenue $98,016K less contract investment amortization ($1,417K) for net fee revenues of $96,599K, plus cost reimbursement revenue of $50,883K. Gross fee revenue includes franchise fees $95,027K and licensing fees and other revenue $2,989K.

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 53 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDZero disclosed franchise units with unknown growth trajectory suggests brand either new, failing, or data transparency issues
  2. 02HIGHExtensive litigation portfolio including data security class action, state AG investigations, antitrust claims, and contractual disputes indicates systemic corporate governance problems
  3. 03MINORNo average revenue or net income disclosure (no Item 19) prevents ROI validation on $2.75M-$4.85M investment
  4. 04MINORUnprotected territory creates direct competition risk and revenue cannibalization among franchisees
  5. 05MINOR5% royalty on gross room sales (not net) combined with high capex requirements creates margin squeeze risk
  6. 06HIGHMarriott brand association provides some credibility, but litigation suggests parent company distance or weak oversight
  7. 07MINOR20-year term locks franchisees into relationship with litigious corporate entity

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 128 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 6.5% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term20 yrs
Renewal termNot extracted
TerritoryNone (caution)
Initial training112 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term20 years
Allowed renewalsℹ0
Territory typeNo territory protection
Protected territoryNo
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Right of first refusalℹNo
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationBaltimore, Maryland
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawMD
Litigation count17
View Item 3 litigation summary

Multiple matters: (A) 2018 Starwood data security breach MDL and related administrative investigations/regulatory actions in US, UK, Turkey, Canada, Australia; (B) Resort/destination fee investigations and DC lawsuit (settled 2025); (C) Portillo antitrust class action, Segal antitrust class action, Hall negligence ($16M verdict, settled 2025), Marriott v Lucky Cleveland arbitration ($1.95M awarded), SRG v Discover credit card proceeds dispute; (D) Several concluded cases including Rahman Property System Incident (settled), HPT arbitration, two Puerto Rico resort fee suits (settled individually), Cityfront Hotel Associates (settled 2017), Todd Hall (settled).

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
3 hrs
On-the-job training
0 hrs
Training location
Remote/web-based and on-site at hotel or location designated by Marriott
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
franchisee (with franchisor approval)
Franchisor financing
Offered
Item 10
POS system
MARSHA and One Yield
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: MARSHA and One Yield

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

20 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 20 contacts · $49
Free preview
442039••••
Unlock all 20 contacts
(301) 380-••••
(405) 808-••••
(972) 670-••••
(301) 380-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a City Express by Marriott franchise?

The total investment to open a City Express by Marriott franchise ranges from $2.8M – $4.9M, with an initial franchise fee of $75K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do City Express by Marriott franchise owners earn?

City Express by Marriott makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD - a voluntary item under the FTC Franchise Rule - so no unit revenue figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns City Express by Marriott?

City Express by Marriott is franchised by MIF, L.L.C.. Its parent company is Marriott International, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the City Express by Marriott FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the City Express by Marriott FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is City Express by Marriott's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for City Express by Marriott (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many City Express by Marriott franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, City Express by Marriott has 11 total units in the United States, including 11 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 10 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is City Express by Marriott a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates City Express by Marriott as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 53 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent City Express by Marriott, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Lodging franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Lodging category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.