Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Broken Yolk Cafe logo

Broken Yolk Cafe Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Full-Service RestaurantsCaliforniaFranchising since 2010
AStrongest tierStrongest tier75/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$560K – $1.6M
Disclosed sales
$2.7M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Under 10 loans (5)

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00395FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent95%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Broken Yolk Cafe is a full-service franchise serving breakfast and brunch classics like omelets, pancakes, and skillets. Franchisees run the cafes, managing the kitchen, table service, and staffing.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Broken Yolk Cafe franchise requires a total initial investment of $560K – $1.6M, including a $20K franchise fee and an ongoing 4.5% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $2.7M[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$560K – $1.6M
25th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$2.7M
12th pct Service Resta…
Royalty
4.5%
6th pct Service Resta…
Units
41
26th pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Full-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$560K – $1.6M
Median $678K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$20K – $20K
Median $40K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$90K – $160K
Median $43K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$2.7M
Median $1.6M
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
4.5%
Median 5.0%
below median ↓, better than category
Ongoing Fees
6.0% of rev
Median 7.0%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Under 10 loans (5)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 5 loans, rate hidden below 10
System Size
41 units
Median 20 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Full-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $560K – $1.6M including a $20K franchise fee, 4.5% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $2.7M/year (median $2.7M).
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 75/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +1 franchised outlets in the latest year (1 opened, 0 closed) (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 17.6% CAGR over 3 years with 41 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
BYC Franchising, LLC
Parent company
BYC, Inc. (affiliate/trademark licensor)
FDD Item 1, page 11 of the 2026 FDD
Incorporated in
California
HQ
1851 Garnet Avenue, San Diego, CA 92109
Auditor
Baker Tilly US, LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$5.6M
vs $5.9M prior year

Independent franchisee associations

  • Franchise Advisory Council (FAC)

Franchisee-led councils or alliances disclosed in Item 20. Indicates operator voice.

Affiliated brands

  • BYC

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
John Gelastopoulos
Headquarters
California
Founded
2010
FDD year
2026
States available
6

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 62% above the typical full-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$560K – $1.6MNot cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Franchise fee$20,000Verified — printed on page 14 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty4.5%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund1.5%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$90K – $160K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown16 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Feenot refundable$20K$20K
Training Fee and Pre-Opening Support$25K$25K
Additional Training Fee$0$1K
Travel and Living Expenses While Training$0$18K
Building and Improvements$165K$650K
Utility Deposits$5K$12K
Signs (indoor and outdoor)$18K$23K
Equipment, Fixtures and Furnishings$165K$600K
POS System$35K$40K
Opening Inventory and Uniforms$19K$35K
Menus$800$2K
Business Licenses$2K$4K
Insurance$5K$12K
Opening Advertising$5K$5K
Architect/Designer$6K$31K
Additional Funds - First 3 months of operations$90K$160K
Total initial investment$560K$1.6M

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$560K – $1.6M
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$90K – $160K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$20K – $20K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
4.5%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.5%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
6.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Broken Yolk Cafe: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty4.5% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund1.5% of gross sales
Technology fee$100
Training fee$25K
Transfer fee$5K
Renewal fee$10K
Inventory (initial)$19K – $35K
Total fee load6.0% of rev
Fee structure insight

A 6.0% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 67% above the full-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$2.7MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 75 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$2.7MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 75 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size38 outlets

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Broken Yolk Cafe until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$1.2M

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Broken Yolk Cafe unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $2,682,134 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $560K–$1.6M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $90K–$160K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$1.2M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$2.7M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$2.7M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
38 outlets
vs category median 18 · large
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
7 / 10
vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank12th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank25th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank6th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank26th
vs Full-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank8th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 801 Full-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 134 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $2.7M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 2.4x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 6.0% (near the Full-Service Restaurants median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 7/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 17.6% CAGR over 3 years across 41 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Full-Service Restaurants medians

How Broken Yolk Cafe Compares

Metric
Broken Yolk Cafe
Category median
vs median
Investment
$1.1M
$678Kmiddle half $427K–$1.3M · n=326
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$2.7M
$1.6Mmiddle half $885K–$2.4M · n=122
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
41
20middle half 6–73 · n=308
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Full-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units41Verified — printed on page 78 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+17.6% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
41
Opened
1
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
98%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+17.6%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+17.6%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
2
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
2023
37
Franchised units
2024
39+2
Franchised units
2025
40+1
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 4 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 4 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • Illinois

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

38 current owners across 4 states.

  • CA 27
  • NV 5
  • AZ 4
  • TX 2

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 5 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA loan disclosures. This brand has only 5 7(a) loans on file; statistical reliability is limited below 10 loans.

Total loans
5
Loan volume
$7.1M
Median loan
$1.3M
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Under 10 loans (5)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 5 loans, rate hidden below 10

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Under 10 loans (5)
5-yr charge-off
Under 10 loans (5)
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
4
Defaults
N/A

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
3
Loan volume
$2.3M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
65

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offUnder 10 loans (5)
Verdict score75/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier75Verdict score 75/100

Broken Yolk Cafe presents moderate-to-cautionary risk: stagnant unit growth, regulatory history, high capital requirements, and non-transparent profitability metrics warrant deep validation before commitment.

High confidence±6 pts
6981

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

One Item 3 matter: In the Matter of the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation v. BYC, Inc. and BYC Franchising, LLC (California DFPI). Affiliate BYC, Inc. sold 3 unregistered California franchises 2005-2008 without required FDD; settled by Consent Order effective July 15, 2021 with $10,000 administrative penalty plus $5,000 attorney's fees/costs and a desist-and-refrain order. No other litigation required to be disclosed.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Baker Tilly US, LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $5.6MYr 2: $5.9M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 75 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORStagnant unit growth of only 2.6% YoY with 41 units indicates mature/declining system with minimal expansion
  2. 02MINOR2021 DFPI Consent Order reveals historical compliance failures (unregistered franchises 2005-2008) and regulatory scrutiny
  3. 03MED20-year term locks franchisees into long commitment with limited exit flexibility in slow-growth system

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 134 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 6.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term20 yrs
Renewal term20 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training44 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term20 years
Renewal term20 years
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population100,000
Online sales rightsGranted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ1
Curable defaultsℹ3
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationSan Diego, California
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawCalifornia
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

One Item 3 matter: In the Matter of the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation v. BYC, Inc. and BYC Franchising, LLC (California DFPI). Affiliate BYC, Inc. sold 3 unregistered California franchises 2005-2008 without required FDD; settled by Consent Order effective July 15, 2021 with $10,000 administrative penalty plus $5,000 attorney's fees/costs and a desist-and-refrain order. No other litigation required to be disclosed.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
44 hrs
On-the-job training
116 hrs
Training location
San Diego, California
Ongoing training
Required

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

43 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 43 contacts · $49
Free preview
858-270-••••
Unlock all 43 contacts
858-564-••••CA
702-462-••••NV
760-471-••••CA
619-825-••••CA

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Broken Yolk Cafe franchise?

The total investment to open a Broken Yolk Cafe franchise ranges from $560K – $1.6M, with an initial franchise fee of $20K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Broken Yolk Cafe franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Broken Yolk Cafe FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $2.7M. The median is $2.7M. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Broken Yolk Cafe?

Broken Yolk Cafe is franchised by BYC Franchising, LLC. Its parent company is BYC, Inc. (affiliate/trademark licensor). Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Broken Yolk Cafe FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Broken Yolk Cafe FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Broken Yolk Cafe's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Broken Yolk Cafe (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Broken Yolk Cafe franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Broken Yolk Cafe has 41 total units in the United States, including 40 franchised units and 1 company-owned units. 1 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Broken Yolk Cafe a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Broken Yolk Cafe as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 75 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Broken Yolk Cafe, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Full-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Full-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.