Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2026 filing

Bricks 4 Kidz litigation history

What Bricks 4 Kidz disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.

Items 3 (litigation) & 4 (bankruptcy) at a glance

What the filing discloses

Cases disclosed
10
Item 3, as counted in the filing
Largest settlement, franchisor's own cases
None stated
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
Filing year
2026
Disclosures cover the prior ten years

Extracted from the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document

Item 3: litigation

10 cases disclosed in Item 3, inherited from predecessor Creative Learning Corporation; includes civil suits by franchisees, SEC enforcement action (settled), Virginia state franchise law violation (settled with $94,900 payment), and shareholder suits related to Creative Learning Corporation stock value. Most settled and closed; one California shareholder suit filed November 2025 remains active.

Item 3 (litigation) · 10 matters disclosed · 1 pending listed

Litigation cases

The franchisor and its predecessor

Concluded (7)

  • Indy Bricks, LLC, Ben Schreiber, and Kate Schreiber v. BFK Franchise Company, LLC, and Creative Learning Corporation

    concluded

    Brought by a franchisee · filed 2017-11-08 · American Arbitration Association · 01-17-0006-7716

    “… Case No. 01-17-0006-7716 (American Arbitration Association filed November 8, 2017). Our current franchisee, Indy Bricks, LLC, and its owners, Ben & Kate Schreiber filed a demand for arbitration on November 8, 2017, alleging breach of contract for our alleged failure to comply with Indy Bricks”Page 13 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “On April 23, 2020 a settlement agreement was entered into between Indy Bricks, LLC and its owners, Ben and Kate Schreiber and us where the arbitration was dismissed. Indy Bricks, LLC will pay us $4,000 of past due franchise fees, monthly marketing and royalty fees and monthly fees to utilize our FMS. Indy Bricks, LLC has satisfied their obligations.”

  • Team Kasa, LLC, Karen June, Alexander Gilbert, AnnMarie Gilbert (f/k/a Zaollosi) v. BFK Franchise Company, LLC (d/b/a Bricks 4 Kidz)

    concluded

    filed 2017-02-24 · American Arbitration Association · 01-17-0001-1968

    “v. BFK Franchise Company, LLC (d/b/a Bricks 4 Kidz), Case No. 01-17-0001-1968 (American Arbitration Association filed February 24, 2017, amended October 10, 2017). Franchisee, along with its three owners, initiated arbitration seeking to hold us jointly and severally liable”Page 13 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “Both parties agreed to settle without admitting any fault, liability, or wrongdoing. BFK Franchise has been removed from the case as Respondent. The resolution described pertains to the parties who participated in the mediation and reached the settlement agreement. However, it is acknowledged there are other respondents who have not yet resolved their status within the case. At this time, we are unable to comment on ...”

  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brian Pappas, etc al.

    concluded

    Government or regulatory action · Creative Learning Corporation - the filing says only “the Company”, which it never defines; see count_note · filed 2017-08-21 · United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division · 3:17- cv00954-TJC-JRK (printed thus in the caption; “3:17-cv-00954-TJC-JRK” twice afterwards)

    “… (Civil Action No. 3:17- cv00954-TJC-JRK). On August 21, 2017, the SEC filed a Civil Complaint against the Company and certain former executive officers and directors”Page 14 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “The entering of the final judgment order has resolved all allegations pertaining to the Company. The Company was not assessed any monetary penalties.”

  • Back and 4th, LLC and Kristena Bins-Turner v. BFK Franchise Company, LLC

    concluded

    Brought by a franchisee · filed 2016-10-07 · American Arbitration Association · 01-16-0004-3745

    “… American Arbitration Association Case No. 01-16-0004-3745. Our current franchisee, Back and 4th, LLC, and its owner, Kristena Bins-Turner, filed a demand for arbitration on October 7, 2016”Page 12 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “On April 24, 2018, we paid $45,000 to Kristena Bins-Turner and Back and 4th, LLC to settle an arbitration award entered on February 13, 2018. That amount included reimbursement of $15,381.01 for arbitration costs related to the eight franchise territories that Back and 4th LLC owned. The case has been settled and closed.”

  • Commonwealth of Virginia - Division of Securities and Retail Franchising Settlement Order and Admission and Consent

    concluded

    Government or regulatory action · filed 2016 · Commonwealth of Virginia Corporation Commission, Division of Securities and Retail Franchising · SEC 2016-00025

    “Commonwealth of Virginia - Case No. SEC 2016-00025. In June 2016, we entered into a Settlement Order and Admission and Consent (the “Order”) with the Commonwealth of Virginia Corporation Commission's (the “Commission”) Division of Securities and Retail Franchising (the "Division"), whereby we agreed to (i) pay restitution, penalties, and investigative costs in the amount of $94,900”Page 14 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “We did not admit or deny any of the allegations set forth in the Order.”

  • Franventures, LLC v. Creative Learning Corporation, and BFK Franchise Company, LLC

    concluded

    filed 2016-03-07 · Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit, in and for St. Johns County, Florida · CAl6- 0236 (printed thus; also given as “Case No. CA 16-236” later in the same paragraph)

    “… Case No. CAl6- 0236 (Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit, in and for St. Johns County, Florida). On March 7, 2016, Brian Pappas, former CEO of Creative Learning Corporation and member of FranVentures, LLC, filed suit for breach of contract”Page 11 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “On May 22, 2021, Creative Learning Corporation, Brian Pappas, Christine Pappas and Franventures entered into an agreement under which the parties agreed to mutually release all parties from any claims or causes of action that they have against the other, including without limitation any claims asserted in Case No. CA 15-1076 and Case No. CA 16-236. Creative Learning Corporation agreed to pay Brian Pappas and his ...” (page 12)

  • Creative Learning Corporation v. Brian Pappas

    concluded

    Brought by the franchisor · Creative Learning Corporation · filed 2015-10-02 · Circuit Court for the Seventh Judicial Circuit, in and for St. Johns County, Florida · CA15-1076

    “… Case No. CA15-1076 (Circuit Court for the Seventh Judicial Circuit, in and for St. Johns County, Florida) On October 2, 2015, Creative Learning Corporation filed suit against Brian Pappas ("Pappas"), former CEO of Creative Learning Corporation and member of FranVentures, LLC, for various claims related to his conduct as CEO.”Page 12 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “On December 11, 2017, Pappas filed a counterclaim alleging he is entitled to indemnification from Creative Learning Corporation for any damages, fines, or fees accrued against him as a result of actions or investigations related to his conduct as CEO. We dispute this counterclaim, and intend to ardently pursue our claims, and defend our interest in these matters. Creative Learning Corporation agreed to pay Brian ...”

Parent, affiliates, master franchisor and subfranchisor

Pending (1)

  • Mark Shaw, Matt Shaw, Craig Pfeffer, Debbie Pfeffer, Thomas Heninger, Robin Heninger and Henry Tableing v. Stroomx, LLC, Chris Rego, Gary Zell, Rod Whiton and Michael Elkin

    pending

    Brought by a third party · StroomX, LLC - the franchisor's former parent, which spun BFK off in February 2025 and still manages the system per Item 1 · filed 2025-11-05 · Superior Court for Santa Clara County, California · 25CV479391

    “Tableing v. Stroomx, LLC, Chris Rego, Gary Zell, Rod Whiton and Michael Elkin, Superior Court for Santa Clara County, California, Case No. 25CV479391 (November 5, 2025). The plaintiffs are shareholders in the public company that used to own the Bricks 4 Kidz Business”Page 13 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “Defendants Rego and StroomX will be moving to dismiss the Complaint and otherwise vigorously defending on the merits.”

Concluded (1)

  • Mark Shaw, Matt Shaw, Craig Pfeffer, Debbie Pfeffer, Thomas Heninger, Robin Heninger and Henry Tableing v. Chris Rego, Gary Zell, John Simento, Rod Whiton, Michael Elkin and Stroomx, LLC

    concluded

    Brought by a third party · StroomX, LLC - the franchisor's former parent, which spun BFK off in February 2025 and still manages the system per Item 1 · filed 2024-08-05 · Circuit Court, Seventh Judicial Circuit, in and for St. Johns County, Florida, Division 55 · 55-2024-CA-001051

    “Tableing v. Chris Rego, Gary Zell, John Simento, Rod Whiton, Michael Elkin and Stroomx, LLC. Circuit Court, Seventh Judicial Circuit, in and for St. Johns County, Florida, Case No. 55-2024-CA-001051, Division 55 (August 5, 2024). Plaintiffs filed suit against Defendants in two counts – breach of fiduciary duties (against the individual defendants) and constructive fraud”Page 13 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “Defendants Simento and Elkin have been dismissed from the case (July 9, 2025). All claims have been dismissed by the trial court.”

Officers and directors (individuals, not the company)

Concluded (1)

  • Team Kasa, LLC, Karen June, Alexander Gilbert, and AnnMarie Szollosi Gilbert (f/k/a AnnMarie Szollosi) v. Brian Pappas, FranVentures, LLC, Richard Humphrey, Franchise BIZ Experts, LLC, William Litster, and Ameridream Investments, LLC

    concluded

    Brought by a franchisee · Brian Pappas, former CEO of Creative Learning Corporation (the predecessor franchisor); no franchisor-side entity is a defendant · filed 2017-02-24 · United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York · 2:17-cv-01074

    “v. Brian Pappas, FranVentures, LLC, Richard Humphrey, Franchise BIZ Experts, LLC, William Litster, and Ameridream Investments, LLC, Case No. 2:17-cv-01074 (E.D.N.Y. filed February 24, 2017). Franchisee, along with its three owners, filed suit against former CEO of Creative Learning Corporation, BFK Franchise Company, LLC’s parent company, alleging disclosure violations under Section 683 of the New York State Franchise Sales Act”Page 12 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “The Franchisee, and its owners seek monetary damages. We deny these allegations and the case has been settled and closed.”

Item 3 lists the litigation the franchisor must disclose; a matter against a parent, an affiliate or a named officer is not a matter against the franchisor, and pending claims are allegations, not findings.

Disclosure signals that moved the score

How this shows up in the verdict

  • Serious inherited litigation involving SEC financial disclosure violations and Virginia governmental actions suggests systemic compliance and transparency issues
  • SEC/financial disclosure litigation raises questions about accuracy of current financial representations to franchisees

The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.

Before you weigh a lawsuit

How to read Item 3

A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.

Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:

  • Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
  • Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
  • Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?