Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
BISHOPS logo

Bishops Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Personal Care & BeautyTXFranchising since 2023
BAbove averageAbove average55/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$373K – $544K
Disclosed sales
$515K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
16.0%
on 39 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-17436FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent81%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Bishops Cuts/Color is a hair salon franchise offering walk-in haircuts, color, and styling for men and women in a modern setting. Franchisees run the salons, managing stylists, scheduling, and retail products.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A BISHOPS franchise requires a total initial investment of $373K – $544K, including a $50K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $515K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 16.0% charge-off rate across 39 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$373K – $544K
41st pct Personal Care…
Avg gross sales
$515K
15th pct Personal Care…
Royalty
6.0%
12th pct Personal Care…
Units
40
31st pct Personal Care…
SBA charge-off
16.0%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Personal Care & Beauty · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$373K – $544K
Median $402K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$50K – $50K
Median $45K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$30K – $50K
Median $34K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$515K
Median $527K
near median
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 6.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Median 7.9%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
16.0%
39 loans · Median 5.7%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
40 units
Median 40 units
near median
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.8%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Personal Care & Beauty median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $373K – $544K including a $50K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $515K/year.
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 55/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 16.0% across 39 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHFlat: no net change in franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 0 closed); 1 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • EARLYEmerging franchise: only 3 years of franchising with 40 units. Early-stage systems carry higher risk but may offer better territory availability.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
BCC Franchising, LLC
Parent company
BCC Services Intermediate Holding Company d/b/a Head to Toe Brands
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
Ultimate parent
BCC Services Holding Company
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
Predecessor
Bishops Franchising, LLC (formerly BBS Holding Group, LLC)
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer (of parent, Head to Toe Brands)
Meg Roberts
Incorporated in
DE
HQ
550 Reserve Street, Suite 380, Southlake, Texas 76092
Auditor
Plante & Moran, PLLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$1.8M
vs $12.4M prior year

Affiliated brands

  • The Lash Franchise Holdings
  • Frenchies
  • Crown Extension Bar

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 8

2 other brands on this site name BCC Services Holding Company as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2026 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Meg Roberts
Headquarters
TX
Founded
2022
FDD year
2026
States available
15

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 14% above the typical personal care & beauty franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$373K – $544KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 23 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$50,000Verified — printed on page 15 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$30K – $50K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown17 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee$50K$50K
Leasehold Improvements$157K$212K
Furniture, Fixtures, Decor, and Equipment$67K$77K
Salon Layout, Architect, Engineer, Drawings, and Permits$10K$16K
Professional Fees (first year)$1K$4K
Business Licenses, Permits, etc. (first year)$75$3K
Initial Inventory$11K$16K
Signage$8K$22K
Technology Hardware, and POS Software$11K$14K
Initial Training Fee (covers two individuals)$8K$8K
Pre-opening training expenses (for up to two individuals)$3K$12K
Utility Deposits, Expenses and Payments (first three months)$250$500
Pre-Opening Marketing (60 days prior to opening)$5K$10K
Marketing (first three months post opening)$6K$15K
Security Deposit and Lease Payment (first three months)$5K$32K
Insurance Deposits and Premiums (first three months)$1K$3K
Additional Funds (first three months)$30K$50K
Total initial investment$373K$544K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$373K – $544K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$30K – $50K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$50K – $50K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

BISHOPS: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$200
Training fee$8K
Transfer fee$5K
Renewal fee$3K
Inventory (initial)$11K – $16K
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales land near the personal care & beauty norm.

Avg gross sales$515KNot cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size40 outlets

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for BISHOPS until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$499K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one BISHOPS unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $514,869 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $373K–$544K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $30K–$50K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$499K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$515K
Per unit/yr · from the Item 19 franchised-cohort breakdown (no single system-wide average disclosed)

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
40 outlets
vs category median 38
Range (low → high)
$176K→$978KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 48 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$340K→$744K
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
3 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · below
Gross sales rank15th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank41th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank12th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank31th
vs Personal Care & Beauty peers
Risk score rank42th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 177 Personal Care & Beauty brands

Showing the headline figures — all 157 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $515K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.1x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Personal Care & Beauty median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 3/10 — moderate disclosure depth. Average and range data are available but detailed cohort breakdowns may be limited.

Operator retention

System roughly stable (0.0% 3-year CAGR) with 40 units.

Multi-unit rate

Only 1% of franchisees own multiple units. Could indicate challenging economics or a young system where operators haven't had time to expand.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Personal Care & Beauty medians

How Bishops Compares

Metric
Bishops
Category median
vs median
Investment
$459K
$402Kmiddle half $261K–$677K · n=112
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$515K
$527Kmiddle half $402K–$892K · n=59
Near median
Unit Count
40
40middle half 8–151 · n=111
Near median

Category median of published Personal Care & Beauty brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units40Verified — printed on page 49 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+0.0%

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
40
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
1.0%
Net growth (3-yr)
+0.0%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+0.0%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
1
0.03 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
8
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Continuity rate
100.0%
Units that stayed open
2023
40
Franchised units
2024
40±0
Franchised units
2025
40±0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 15 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 15 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • Virginia

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

37 current owners across 13 states; 7 former (terminated, transferred or not renewed) listed separately.

  • OR 8
  • WA 7
  • CA 4
  • CO 3
  • OH 3
  • TX 3
  • AZ 2
  • VA 2
  • GA 1
  • MI 1
  • MN 1
  • MT 1
  • +1 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

D
SBA Lending Health
Below-average SBA lending record · 16.0% charge-off
Total loans
39
Loan volume
$10.6M
Median loan
$294K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
16.0%
on 39 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
84.0%
5-yr charge-off
22.2%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
16
Defaults
4
Typical loan rate
7.7%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
12.1%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
404
6.0 per loan
Lender concentration
24%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 76% went to startups / new businesses, 24% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in beauty salons, franchised businesses charge off at 12.1% vs 18.6% for independents — franchising is associated with 35% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Bishops franchisees

Stearns Bank National Association6 loans0.0%
The Huntington National Bank3 loans50.0%
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company2 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 16 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Bishops from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
7.4%
Avg SBA guarantee
70%
Avg interest rate
7.71%
Avg chargeoff amount
$168K
Lender concentration
24.0%
Job velocity
6.0 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
10.9%
NAICS 812112
Jobs supported
404

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 24% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Stearns Bank National Association6$1.6M0.0%
2The Huntington National Bank3$775K50.0%
3Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company2$320K0.0%
4Pinnacle Bank2$700K0.0%
5Wells Fargo Bank National Association2$567K50.0%
6Cadence Bank2$650K0.0%
7Northwest Bank2$280KN/A
8North State Bank1$332KN/A
9BankUnited, National Association1$256K0.0%
10Wallis Bank1$270K100.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
CACalifornia300.0%
ILIllinois3150.0%
NCNorth Carolina300.0%
OROregon30--
VAVirginia300.0%
COColorado2150.0%
GAGeorgia200.0%
MNMinnesota200.0%
TXTexas21100.0%
OHOhio100.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2018
11
2019
12
2020
1
2026
1

Borrower profile

Startup17 (68%)
Unanswered3 (12%)
Existing (2+ yr)3 (12%)
New (< 1 yr)2 (8%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans here charge off near the 16.0% national average.

SBA charge-off16.0% · 39 loans
Verdict score55/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average55Verdict score 55/100
High confidence±4 pts
5159

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation required to be disclosed in Item 3.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Plante & Moran, PLLC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $1.8MYr 2: $12.4MTotal: $1.8MNon-royalty: $0.1M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 55 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDNet income not disclosed in FDD — impossible to assess true profitability despite $542k avg revenue claim
  2. 02MINOROnly 40 units system-wide with unknown growth trajectory — insufficient scale and unclear expansion momentum
  3. 03MINORMinimum $250/week royalty ($13k/year) creates fixed cost floor regardless of performance, problematic for underperforming locations
  4. 04MINORHigh initial investment ($373k–$544k) paired with opaque profitability creates significant downside risk

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 157 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training54 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius4 mi
Territory population50,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ20 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ4
Curable defaultsℹ4
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationAAA offices in the city of franchisor's principal place of business (currently Southlake/Tarrant County, Texas)
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawTX
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation required to be disclosed in Item 3.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
54 hrs
On-the-job training
0 hrs
Training location
Dallas, Texas (Business Training); franchisee's Store (Store Opening Training)
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
12 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Mutual — franchisee selects within Site Selection Area; franchisor approves within 30 days
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Third-party cloud-based POS system
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: Third-party cloud-based POS system

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

44 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 44 contacts · $49
Free preview
406-534-••••MT
Unlock all 44 contacts
704-332-••••NC
(503) 548-••••OR
425-679-••••WA
512-551-••••TX

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a BISHOPS franchise?

The total investment to open a BISHOPS franchise ranges from $373K – $544K, with an initial franchise fee of $50K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do BISHOPS franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the BISHOPS FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $515K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns BISHOPS?

BISHOPS is franchised by BCC Franchising, LLC. Its parent company is BCC Services Intermediate Holding Company d/b/a Head to Toe Brands. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is BCC Services Holding Company. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the BISHOPS FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the BISHOPS FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is BISHOPS's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, BISHOPS has a charge-off rate of 16.0% across 39 loans, meaning 16.0% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many BISHOPS franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, BISHOPS has 40 total units in the United States, including 40 franchised units and 0 company-owned units.

Is BISHOPS a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates BISHOPS as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 55 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent BISHOPS, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Personal Care & Beauty franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Personal Care & Beauty category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.