Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Aloft Hotels logo

Aloft Hotels Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

LodgingMarylandFranchising since 2006
BAbove averageAbove average64/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$13.3M – $29.4M
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
Under 10 loans (3)

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00103FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent81%
Manager-run OKNo: No territory protection

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Aloft Hotels is Marriott's upper-midscale, design-forward select-service hotel franchise aimed at younger travelers. Franchisees own and operate individual properties, running rooms, bar, and guest services on Marriott's systems.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Aloft Hotels franchise requires a total initial investment of $13.3M – $29.4M, including a $75K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.5% royalty[2]. The 2025 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored4 of 5 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$13.3M – $29.4M
51st pct Lodging
Avg gross sales
N/A
Projection
Royalty
5.5%
39th pct Lodging
Units
166
51st pct Lodging
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Lodging · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$13.3M – $29.4M
Median $8.9M
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$75K – $75K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$160K – $550K
Median $312K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
5.5%
Median 5.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
6.5% of rev
Median 8.5%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Under 10 loans (3)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 3 loans, rate hidden below 10
System Size
166 units
Median 60 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
0.6%
Median 0.7%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
None
The franchisor can open or license outlets nearby
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
15 cases
Review carefully

Green = favorable by >10% vs Lodging median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $13.3M – $29.4M including a $75K franchise fee, 5.5% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSItem 19 reports ADR/Occupancy/RevPAR (not full gross sales). For the 149 STR Included Hotels in 2024: average ADR $154.61, average OCC 69.7%, average RevPAR $107.73, RevPAR Index 100.8. RevPAR ranged $31.92-$197.04 (median $99.76); ADR ranged $80.85-$232.01 (median $144.86). No revenue/profit figures disclosed.
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 64/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +4 franchised outlets in the latest year (5 opened, 1 closed); 51 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • LEGAL15 litigation matters disclosed in Item 3, higher than typical. Review the summary for patterns (franchisor-initiated vs. franchisee-initiated).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
MIF, L.L.C.
Parent company
Marriott International, Inc.
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
7750 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20814
Auditor
Ernst & Young LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$103.3M
vs $94.4M prior year

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 9

8 other brands on this site name Marriott International, Inc. as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Anthony Capuano
Headquarters
Maryland
FDD year
2025
States available
35

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 140% above the typical lodging franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$13.3M – $29.4MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 68 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$75,000Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Royalty5.5%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 39 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund1.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 39 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$160K – $550K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown19 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Application Fee$75K$75K
Pre-Opening Training, Revenue Management, Marketing & Digital Support, and Related Services$50K$81K
Property Management, Reservation, Yield Management, Opportunity Management, and Other Systems$83K$135K
Market Feasibility Study$6K$18K
Real Estate——
Building Permit, Tap, and Impact Fees——
Building Construction$10.2M$23.4M
Kitchen and Laundry Equipment$280K$671K
Furniture and Fixtures$1.4M$2.6M
Technology Hardware & Software and Network Infrastructure$136K$239K
Operating Supplies$184K$252K
Professional Design Services (including stylist)$380K$854K
Insurance——
Start-up Costs$184K$385K
Hard Cost Contingency (5% of hard costs)——
Food Safety and Sanitation Compliance$210$210
Food and Beverage Consulting Services$6K$8K
Opening Advertising$121K$156K
Additional Funds (first 3 months)$240K$550K
Total initial investment$13.3M$29.4M

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$13.3M – $29.4M
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$160K – $550K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$75K – $75K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
5.5%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
6.5%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Aloft Hotels: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.5% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund1.0% of gross sales
Transfer fee$150K
Total fee load6.5% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typeoccupancy, ADR and RevPAR
Sample sizeNot extracted

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for Aloft Hotels is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Aloft Hotels unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $13.3M–$29.4M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $160K–$550K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$21.7M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Item 19 reports ADR/Occupancy/RevPAR (not full gross sales). For the 149 STR Included Hotels in 2024: average ADR $154.61, average OCC 69.7%, average RevPAR $107.73, RevPAR Index 100.8. RevPAR ranged $31.92-$197.04 (median $99.76); ADR ranged $80.85-$232.01 (median $144.86). No revenue/profit figures disclosed.

Showing the headline figures — all 108 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 6.5% — below the Lodging median of 8.5%.

Disclosure

Item 19 reports occupancy, ADR and RevPAR rather than annual gross sales, so unit revenue is not directly comparable.

Operator retention

System expanding at 6.5% CAGR over 3 years across 166 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Multi-unit rate

Only 15% of franchisees own multiple units. Could indicate challenging economics or a young system where operators haven't had time to expand.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Lodging medians

How Aloft Hotels Compares

Metric
Aloft Hotels
Category median
vs median
Investment
$21.3M
$8.9Mmiddle half $1.2M–$18.3M · n=96
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
N/A
$1.4Mmiddle half $1.0M–$1.8M · n=2
N/A
Unit Count
166
60middle half 6–245 · n=126
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Lodging brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units166Verified — printed on page 127 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+6.5% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate0.6% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
166
Opened
5
Last reporting year
Closed
1
Non-renewed
1
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
0.6%
Company-owned
2
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
99%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
15.0%
Net growth (3-yr)
+6.5%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+6.5%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Not renewed
1
Signed, not yet open
51
0.31 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
1
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
3.0%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Continuity rate
99.4%
Units that stayed open
Termination rate
0.6%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
2022
154
Franchised units
2023
160+6
Franchised units
2024
164+4
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 34 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 34 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

160 current owners across 34 states.

  • TX 31
  • FL 18
  • CA 10
  • NC 10
  • NY 9
  • GA 7
  • OH 7
  • AZ 5
  • IL 5
  • SC 5
  • TN 5
  • CO 4
  • +22 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 12 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA loan disclosures. This brand has only 3 7(a) loans on file; statistical reliability is limited below 10 loans.

Total loans
3
Loan volume
$8.2M
Median loan
$1.0M
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Under 10 loans (3)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 3 loans, rate hidden below 10

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Under 10 loans (3)
5-yr charge-off
Under 10 loans (3)
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
1
Defaults
N/A

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
2
Loan volume
$7.2M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
41

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offUnder 10 loans (3)
Verdict score64/100 (higher is better)
Litigation15 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average64Verdict score 64/100

Aloft presents meaningful caution-level risk due to extreme capital requirements without financial transparency, litigation overhang from data breach, stagnant unit growth, and unprotected territories—requiring deep validation of actual unit economics before commitment.

Moderate confidence±10 pts
5474

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Item 3 discloses: (A) Data Security Incident matters (4 case groups incl. MDL No. 19-md-2879, City of Chicago v. Marriott, administrative investigations, Canadian actions); (B) Destination/Resort Fee matter (District of Columbia v. Marriott); (C) 3 franchisor-initiated arbitrations/suits (Arkansas Knoxville Hotel, Lucky Cleveland Holdings, Pride Hotel); (D) 3 other pending actions (Portillo v. CoStar antitrust, Segal v. Amadeus antitrust, Hall v. Marriott $16M NC verdict on appeal); (E) 6 concluded actions (Rahman, HPT arbitration, Rivera, Puleo, Cityfront, Todd Hall). Most matters target parent MII; franchisor-initiated suits target franchisees.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Ernst & Young LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $103.3MYr 2: $94.4M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 64 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDMassive capital requirement ($13.3M-$36.2M) with no disclosed net income data to validate ROI
  2. 02MINORAnemic unit growth of only 2.5% YoY suggests market saturation or franchisee dissatisfaction in 166-unit system
  3. 03HIGHOngoing 2018 Starwood data breach litigation creates reputational risk and potential liability exposure for franchisees
  4. 04MINORNo protected territory means direct competition from other Aloft franchisees and Marriott brands in same market
  5. 05MINOR5.5% royalty on gross room sales is owed regardless of profitability, creating cash flow pressure during downturns
  6. 06MINORMultiple class-action lawsuits and antitrust investigations indicate systemic franchisor governance issues

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 108 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 6.5% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term20 yrs
Renewal term0 yrs
TerritoryNone (caution)
Initial training154 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term20 years
Renewal term0 years
Allowed renewalsℹ0
Territory typeNo territory protection
Protected territoryNo
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Right of first refusalℹNo
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationBaltimore, Maryland
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawMaryland
Litigation count15
View Item 3 litigation summary

Item 3 discloses: (A) Data Security Incident matters (4 case groups incl. MDL No. 19-md-2879, City of Chicago v. Marriott, administrative investigations, Canadian actions); (B) Destination/Resort Fee matter (District of Columbia v. Marriott); (C) 3 franchisor-initiated arbitrations/suits (Arkansas Knoxville Hotel, Lucky Cleveland Holdings, Pride Hotel); (D) 3 other pending actions (Portillo v. CoStar antitrust, Segal v. Amadeus antitrust, Hall v. Marriott $16M NC verdict on appeal); (E) 6 concluded actions (Rahman, HPT arbitration, Rivera, Puleo, Cityfront, Todd Hall). Most matters target parent MII; franchisor-initiated suits target franchisees.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
154 hrs
On-the-job training
0 hrs
Training location
Off-site and on-site
Time to open
30 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Designated POS System
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Designated POS System

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

172 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 172 contacts · $49
Free preview
(725) 239-••••NV
Unlock all 172 contacts
(407) 380-••••FL
(301) 380-••••MD
(512) 614-••••TX
(574) 288-••••IN

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Aloft Hotels franchise?

The total investment to open a Aloft Hotels franchise ranges from $13.3M – $29.4M, with an initial franchise fee of $75K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Aloft Hotels franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the Aloft Hotels FDD discloses figures for part of the system but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns Aloft Hotels?

Aloft Hotels is franchised by MIF, L.L.C.. Its parent company is Marriott International, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Aloft Hotels FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Aloft Hotels FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Aloft Hotels's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Aloft Hotels (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Aloft Hotels franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Aloft Hotels has 166 total units in the United States, including 164 franchised units and 2 company-owned units. 5 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Aloft Hotels a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Aloft Hotels as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 64 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Aloft Hotels, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Lodging franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Lodging category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.