Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
TWO MAIDS logo

Two Maids Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Cleaning & MaintenanceALFranchising since 2013
AStrongest tierStrongest tier74/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$93K – $150K
Disclosed sales
$580K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Limited · 70 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02823FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent81%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Two Maids is a residential cleaning franchise providing recurring house cleaning with trained teams and a pay-for-performance model. Franchisees run a route-based operation managing crews, scheduling, and customer retention in a territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A TWO MAIDS franchise requires a total initial investment of $93K – $150K, including a $20K franchise fee and an ongoing 7.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average revenue per territory was $580K. This franchisor reports Item 19 per territory rather than per outlet, so the figure is not comparable with per-outlet averages[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$93K – $150K
33rd pct Cleaning & Ma…
Avg gross sales
$580K
Per territory, not per outlet
Royalty
7.0%
38th pct Cleaning & Ma…
Units
144
70th pct Cleaning & Ma…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Cleaning & Maintenance · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$93K – $150K
Median $169K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$20K – $20K
Median $47K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$10K – $40K
Median $30K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$580K
Median $538K
Per territory, not per outlet
Royalty Rate
7.0%
Median 7.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
9.0% of rev
Median 8.3%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited · 70 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 70 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units
System Size
144 units
Median 51 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
4.2%
Median 3.4%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Cleaning & Maintenance median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $93K – $150K including a $20K franchise fee, 7.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage revenue per territory of $580K/year. Averaged per territory, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures.
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 74/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +26 franchised outlets in the latest year (32 opened, 6 closed) (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 45.5% CAGR over 3 years with 144 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Two Maids Franchising, LLC
Parent company
Home Franchise Concepts, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
JM Family Enterprises, Inc.
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
Two Maids of the Southeast, Inc.
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Group President
Paul Ebert
Incorporated in
Alabama
HQ
505 20th Street North, Suite 975, Birmingham, Alabama 35203
Auditor
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$10.9M
vs $10.2M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Independent franchisee associations

  • Franchise Advisory Council (FAC)

Franchisee-led councils or alliances disclosed in Item 20. Indicates operator voice.

Affiliated brands

  • Order Processing Services
  • AdvantaClean Equipment Rental
  • Aussie Pet Mobile
  • Lightspeed Restoration
  • Organized Spaces
  • HFC KTU
  • Loss Control and Recovery
  • American Decorative Coatings
  • AdvantaClean Systems
  • Budget Blinds

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 9

8 other brands on this site name JM Family Enterprises, Inc. as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Portfolio: Home Franchise Concepts

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Paul Ebert
Headquarters
AL
Founded
2013
FDD year
2025
States available
33

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 28% below the typical cleaning & maintenance franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$93K – $150KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 20 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$19,950Verified — printed on page 14 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty7.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$10K – $40K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

TWO MAIDS: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$20K$20K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$10K$40K
Equipment, build-out, other$63K$90K
Total initial investment$93K$150K

Source: TWO MAIDS 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$93K – $150K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$10K – $40K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$20K – $20K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
7.0%
Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

TWO MAIDS: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty7.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$650
Transfer fee$25K
Renewal fee$5K
Total fee load9.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 8% above the cleaning & maintenance norm.

Avg gross sales$580K

Averaged per territory, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size86 territories

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for TWO MAIDS until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$147K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one TWO MAIDS unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per territory, per year (NOT per outlet)FDD
FDD Item 19 reports $580,225 per territory — not per outlet. Every other input below is for ONE unit; replace this with a single-unit figure before relying on the ROIC.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $93K–$150K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $10K–$40K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$147K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Averaged per territory, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Avg gross sales
$580K
Per territory, per year — not per outlet

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
86 territories
vs category median 32 · large
Range (low → high)
$20K→$1.8MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 54 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank33th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank38th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank70th
vs Cleaning & Maintenance peers
Risk score rank16th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 191 Cleaning & Maintenance brands

Showing the headline figures — all 151 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

The average territory generates $580K/year in gross sales.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 9.0% (near the Cleaning & Maintenance median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 45.5% CAGR over 3 years across 144 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Multi-unit rate

50% of franchisees own multiple units, a moderate multi-unit rate.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Cleaning & Maintenance medians

How Two Maids Compares

Metric
Two Maids
Category median
vs median
Investment
$122K
$169Kmiddle half $115K–$269K · n=170
Below median, better than category
Revenue
$580K
$538Kmiddle half $349K–$1.1M · n=59
Not compared

Per territory, not per outlet - the category median is per-outlet only, so no comparison is shown

Unit Count
144
51middle half 12–108 · n=169
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Cleaning & Maintenance brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units144Verified — printed on page 63 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+45.5% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate4.2% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
144
Opened
32
Last reporting year
Closed
6
Turnover rate
4.2%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
1%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
50.0%
Net growth (3-yr)
+45.5%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+45.5%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Transfer rate
6.9%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Termination rate
1.4%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
2.1%
Units that stopped operating
2022
99
Franchised units
2023
118+19
Franchised units
2024
144+26
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 34 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 34 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

151 current owners across 33 states; 7 former (terminated, transferred or not renewed) listed separately.

  • TX 21
  • FL 20
  • GA 10
  • VA 7
  • AL 6
  • NC 6
  • AZ 5
  • CO 5
  • IL 5
  • MD 5
  • MI 5
  • MN 5
  • +21 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
70
Loan volume
$11.6M
Median loan
$166K
average
Charge-off rate
Limited · 70 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 70 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Limited · 70 loans
5-yr charge-off
Limited · 70 loans
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
13
Defaults
2

Vintage analysis

Two Maids charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Two Maids charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 10 vintages from 2017 to 2026. Rates range from 0.0% to 100.0%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%'17'19'21'23'25'26

Top lenders financing Two Maids franchisees

United Midwest Savings Bank National Association44 loans16.7%
The Huntington National Bank6 loans—
First Bank of the Lake4 loans—

Showing 3 of 13 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Two Maids from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Top SBA lenders

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1United Midwest Savings Bank National Association44$6.6M16.7%
2The Huntington National Bank6$731KN/A
3First Bank of the Lake4$666KN/A
4BayFirst National Bank2$199K0.0%
5Celtic Bank Corporation2$284K100.0%
6Readycap Lending, LLC2$343KN/A
7Mission Valley Bank2$855KN/A
8Citizens Bank2$493KN/A
9Florida Capital Bank, National Association1$286K0.0%
10Stearns Bank National Association1$142KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas1100.0%
FLFlorida1000.0%
NJNew Jersey50--
WAWashington50--
OHOhio41100.0%
CACalifornia30--
MDMaryland30--
MIMichigan30--
WIWisconsin30--
AZArizona200.0%

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offLimited · 70 loans
Verdict score74/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases · none name the franchisor
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier74Verdict score 74/100

One disclosed litigation matter, but it is an old 2006 consent order involving an affiliate (Aussie Pet Mobile) under prior ownership, so low weight. Positive net worth of $2.6M offset by a small net loss of -$119,952 on $10.86M revenue. Strong 45.5% net growth across 144 franchised units.

High confidence±4 pts
7078

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

Administrative proceeding before Maryland Securities Commissioner (Case No. 2004-0162, 2005). Aussie Pet Mobile, Inc. entered into Consent Order on January 25, 2006 requiring cease and desist from franchise offer/sale violations of Maryland Franchise Law. No monetary sanctions. Required rescission of franchise agreements with one former franchisee lacking proper disclosure and implementation of new compliance procedures.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $10.9MYr 2: $10.2M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 74 / 100 verdict

  1. 01HIGHSingle old affiliate litigation matter (2006, prior ownership) - low weight
  2. 02MINORSmall net loss: -$119,952 on $10.86M revenue
  3. 03MINORMitigant: positive net worth $2.6M, 45.5% net growth, no turnover

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 151 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training77 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population50,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ25 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationJefferson County, Alabama
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawAlabama
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

Administrative proceeding before Maryland Securities Commissioner (Case No. 2004-0162, 2005). Aussie Pet Mobile, Inc. entered into Consent Order on January 25, 2006 requiring cease and desist from franchise offer/sale violations of Maryland Franchise Law. No monetary sanctions. Required rescission of franchise agreements with one former franchisee lacking proper disclosure and implementation of new compliance procedures.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
45 hrs
On-the-job training
32 hrs
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
6 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee proposes, franchisor approves
Franchisor financing
Offered
Item 10
POS system
CRM System
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: CRM System

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

158 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 158 contacts · $49
Free preview
(281) 213-••••TX
Unlock all 158 contacts
(352) 316-••••FL
(920) 305-••••WI
(516) 286-••••CT
(734) 492-••••MI

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a TWO MAIDS franchise?

The total investment to open a TWO MAIDS franchise ranges from $93K – $150K, with an initial franchise fee of $20K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do TWO MAIDS franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the TWO MAIDS FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $580K. Important context: Averaged per territory, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns TWO MAIDS?

TWO MAIDS is franchised by Two Maids Franchising, LLC. Its parent company is Home Franchise Concepts, LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is JM Family Enterprises, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the TWO MAIDS FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the TWO MAIDS FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is TWO MAIDS's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for TWO MAIDS (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many TWO MAIDS franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, TWO MAIDS has 144 total units in the United States, including 144 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 32 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is TWO MAIDS a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates TWO MAIDS as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 74 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent TWO MAIDS, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Cleaning & Maintenance franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Cleaning & Maintenance category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.