Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Island Fin Poke logo

Island Fin Poke Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsFLFranchising since 2018
CAverageAverage45/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$274K – $440K
Disclosed sales
$531K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Limited · 21 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01314Data QualityExcellent86%FDD 2024 · 2yr old
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

This data is from a 2024 FDD. Current terms may differ. Always verify with the franchisor's latest disclosure document.

Island Fin Poke is a fast-casual franchise serving customizable Hawaiian-style poke bowls with an island vibe. Franchisees run the restaurants, managing fresh-fish prep, staffing, and counter service.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Island Fin Poke franchise requires a total initial investment of $274K – $440K, including a $40K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2024 FDD, average unit revenue was $531K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: C (Average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: high - issued more than two years ago

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored5 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$274K – $440K
42nd pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$531K
Outlet subset5th pct Service Resta…
Royalty
5.0%
12th pct Service Resta…
Units
23
51st pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$274K – $440K
Median $486K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$40K – $40K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$40K – $55K
Median $33K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$531K
Median $975K
below median ↓, worse than category
Outlet subset
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
7.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited · 21 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 21 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units
System Size
23 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
43.5%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $274K – $440K including a $40K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $531K/year (reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system).
  • RISKVerdict C (Average), verdict score 45/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -2 franchised outlets in the latest year (8 opened, 10 closed); 16 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • FLAG9 units terminated last reporting year (39.1% of the system). Ask existing franchisees why.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Island Fin Poke Franchising LLC
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Mark Setterington
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
FL
HQ
7004 Tavistock Lakes Boulevard, Suite 148, Orlando, Florida 32827

Overview

About

CEO
Mark Setterington
Headquarters
FL
Founded
2018
FDD year
2024
States available
10

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 26% below the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$274K – $440KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2024 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$40,000Verified — printed on page 8 of the 2024 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 9 of the 2024 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund0.0%Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Working capital$40K – $55K

Source: FDD 2024 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown15 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee$40K$40K
Your Training Expenses (transportation, lodging, and meals)$2K$2K
Premises deposits$5K$18K
Design and Architect Fees$4K$12K
Leasehold Improvements, Construction and/or Remodeling$120K$220K
Furniture & Fixtures$15K$20K
Exterior Signage$4K$7K
Business Licenses and Permits$2K$3K
Computer Systems$2K$3K
Initial Inventory to Begin Operating$5K$7K
Equipment$25K$40K
Professional Fees$750$2K
Grand Opening Advertising$10K$10K
Insurance$1K$2K
Additional Funds - 3 months$40K$55K
Total initial investment$274K$440K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$274K – $440K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$40K – $55K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$40K – $40K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
0.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Island Fin Poke: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund0.0%
Technology fee$300
Transfer fee$30K
Renewal fee$5K
Inventory (initial)$5K – $7K
Total fee load7.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 46% below the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$531K

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross revenue
Sample size21 outlets

Source: FDD 2024 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Island Fin Poke until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$405K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Island Fin Poke unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $530,811 per unit — Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Adjust to a franchisee figure before relying on this.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $274K–$440K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $40K–$55K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$405K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2024 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Avg gross sales
$531K
Per unit, per year

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross revenue
Sample size
21 outlets
vs category median 19
Range (low → high)
$365K→$980KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 38 of the 2024 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$365K→$767K
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2023
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2024
Disclosed in the 2024 filing, covering 2023
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank5th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank42th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank12th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank51th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank59th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 140 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $531K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.5x. Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.0% (near the Quick-Service Restaurants median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 10.0% CAGR over 3 years across 23 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How Island Fin Poke Compares

Metric
Island Fin Poke
Category median
vs median
Investment
$357K
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Below median, better than category
Revenue
$531K
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
23
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units23Verified — printed on page 39 of the 2024 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth-8.3% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate43.5% (caution)

Source: FDD 2024 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
23
Opened
8
Last reporting year
Closed
10
Terminated
9
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
43.5%
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
96%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-8.3%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+10.0%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
9
Not renewed
0
Signed, not yet open
16
0.70 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
4
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
8.7%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Termination rate
39.1%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
43.5%
Units that stopped operating
2021
20
Franchised units
2022
24+4
Franchised units
2023
22-2
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 10 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

10

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
21
Loan volume
$4.1M
Median loan
$196K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Limited · 21 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 21 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Limited · 21 loans
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
7
Defaults
0
Typical loan rate
8.6%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
10.8%
n=12,827 loans
Jobs supported
230
7.6 per loan
Lender concentration
47%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 80% went to startups / new businesses, 20% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in limited-service restaurants, franchised businesses charge off at 10.8% vs 10.0% for independents — franchising is associated with 8% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Island Fin Poke franchisees

The Huntington National Bank7 loans0.0%
Stearns Bank National Association2 loans0.0%
Cadence Bank2 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 7 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Island Fin Poke from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.0%
Avg SBA guarantee
71%
Avg interest rate
8.57%
Lender concentration
46.7%
Job velocity
7.6 per $100K
Startup risk premium
0.0pp
NAICS benchmark
8.7%
NAICS 722513
Jobs supported
230

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 47% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank7$1.6M0.0%
2Stearns Bank National Association2$298K0.0%
3Cadence Bank2$506K0.0%
4Gulf Coast Bank and Trust Company2$600K0.0%
5UniBank for Savings2$45K0.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
FLFlorida500.0%
GAGeorgia20--
RIRhode Island200.0%
TNTennessee20--
DEDelaware100.0%
ILIllinois100.0%
NVNevada100.0%
VAVirginia100.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2019
1
2020
2
2021
3
2022
2
2023
5
2024
2

Borrower profile

Startup12 (80%)
Existing (2+ yr)2 (13%)
Ownership change1 (7%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offLimited · 21 loans
Verdict score45/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

CAverage45Verdict score 45/100

Contracting franchise system with unverifiable unit economics, no territorial protection, and aggressive fee structure creates significant risk of negative cash flow and poor ROI.

High confidence±6 pts
3951

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation required to be disclosed

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

No audited financials on file

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Financial statements in Exhibit D are unaudited; cover page states no independent CPA has audited the figures or expressed an opinion. No balance sheet or income statement figures present in document text.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 45 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDUnit count declined 8.3% YoY (25 units) — indicates shrinking system and potential franchisee struggles
  2. 02MINORNo protected territory — direct competition from other franchisees and non-franchised poke competitors
  3. 03MINOR5% royalty on gross revenue — aggressive given likely 25-35% food cost and 30%+ labor costs in QSR

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 140 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 7.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training40 hrs

Source: FDD 2024 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius3 mi
Territory population80,000
Online sales rightsℹGranted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice5 days
Curable defaultsℹ1
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationFlorida
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawFL
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation required to be disclosed

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
17 hrs
On-the-job training
23 hrs
Training location
Lake Nona, Florida
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
56 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Time to open
10 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee selects, franchisor approves
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Toast POS
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Toast POS

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

38 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 38 contacts · $49
Free preview
203-451-••••
Unlock all 38 contacts
401-556-••••
480-647-••••
571-205-••••
702-755-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Island Fin Poke franchise?

The total investment to open a Island Fin Poke franchise ranges from $274K – $440K, with an initial franchise fee of $40K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Island Fin Poke franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Island Fin Poke FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $531K. Important context: Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Island Fin Poke?

Island Fin Poke is franchised by Island Fin Poke Franchising LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2024 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Island Fin Poke FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Island Fin Poke FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Island Fin Poke's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Island Fin Poke (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Island Fin Poke franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Island Fin Poke has 23 total units in the United States, including 22 franchised units and 1 company-owned units. 8 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Island Fin Poke a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Island Fin Poke as a C-grade franchise with a verdict score of 45 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Island Fin Poke, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.