Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Camp Run-A-Mutt logo

Camp Run-A-Mutt Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

EducationCAFranchising since 2010
BAbove averageAbove average49/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$589K – $1.1M
Disclosed sales
$1.0M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Limited · 14 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00447Data QualityExcellent95%FDD 2024 · 2yr old
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

This data is from a 2024 FDD. Current terms may differ. Always verify with the franchisor's latest disclosure document.

Camp Run-A-Mutt is a pet care franchise offering dog daycare, boarding, and grooming in an open-play setting. Franchisees run the facilities, managing staff, pet care operations, and scheduling.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Camp Run-A-Mutt franchise requires a total initial investment of $589K – $1.1M, including a $40K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2024 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.0M[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: high - issued more than two years ago

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$589K – $1.1M
67th pct Education
Avg gross sales
$1.0M
26th pct Education
Royalty
6.0%
7th pct Education
Units
12
30th pct Education
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Education · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$589K – $1.1M
Median $194K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$40K – $40K
Median $45K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$100K – $175K
Median $25K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$1.0M
Median $408K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 7.0%
below median ↓, better than category
Ongoing Fees
7.0% of rev
Median 9.0%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited · 14 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 14 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units
System Size
12 units
Median 20 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
8.3%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Education median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $589K – $1.1M including a $40K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.0M/year (median $1.1M).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 49/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -1 franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 1 closed); 4 signed but not yet open (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Camp Run-A-Mutt Entrepreneurial Resources, Inc.
CEO title
President
Dennis Quaglia
CEO experience
15 yrs
Years in role or industry
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
CA
HQ
2900 Fourth Avenue, #206, San Diego, California 92103
Auditor
Kezos & Dunlavy, LLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$918K
vs $930K prior year

Overview

About

CEO
Dennis Quaglia
Headquarters
CA
Founded
2010
FDD year
2024
States available
7

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 345% above the typical education franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$589K – $1.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 20 of the 2024 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$40,000Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 12 of the 2024 FDD (Item 5). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2024 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund1.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2024 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$100K – $175K

Source: FDD 2024 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2024 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Camp Run-A-Mutt: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$40K$40K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$100K$175K
Equipment, build-out, other$449K$925K
Total initial investment$589K$1.1M

Source: Camp Run-A-Mutt 2024 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$589K – $1.1M
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$100K – $175K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$40K – $40K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Camp Run-A-Mutt: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund1.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$0
Transfer fee$20K
Renewal fee$10K
Inventory (initial)$5K – $8K
Total fee load7.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 153% above the education norm.

Avg gross sales$1.0MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 47 of the 2024 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$1.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 47 of the 2024 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typeGross Sales + Significant …
Sample size12 outlets

Source: FDD 2024 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Camp Run-A-Mutt until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$1.0M

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Camp Run-A-Mutt unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,030,390 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $589K–$1.1M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $100K–$175K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$1.0M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2024 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$1.0M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$1.1M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
Gross Sales + Significant Costs by location and summary statistics (average, median, low, high)
Sample size
12 outlets
vs category median 16
Range (low → high)
$346K→$1.8MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 47 of the 2024 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2023
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2024
Disclosed in the 2024 filing, covering 2023
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank26th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank67th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank7th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank30th
vs Education peers
Risk score rank52th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 204 Education brands

Showing the headline figures — all 157 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.0M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.2x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.0% — below the Education median of 9.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System contracting at -7.7% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Education medians

How Camp Run-A-Mutt Compares

Metric
Camp Run-A-Mutt
Category median
vs median
Investment
$864K
$194Kmiddle half $94K–$625K · n=164
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.0M
$408Kmiddle half $269K–$1.2M · n=72
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
12
20middle half 6–79 · n=164
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Education brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units12Verified — printed on page 50 of the 2024 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth-7.7% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate8.3% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2024 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
12
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
1
Terminated
1
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
8.3%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-7.7%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-7.7%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
1
Not renewed
0
Transferred
4
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
4
0.33 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
7
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Termination rate
8.3%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
8.3%
Units that stopped operating
2021
13
Franchised units
2022
13±0
Franchised units
2023
12-1
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 7 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

7

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
14
Loan volume
$6.4M
Median loan
$454K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Limited · 14 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 14 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Limited · 14 loans
5-yr charge-off
Limited · 14 loans
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
9
Defaults
4
Typical loan rate
8.6%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
10.4%
n=1,203 loans
Jobs supported
160
3.0 per loan
Lender concentration
27%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 70% went to startups / new businesses, 30% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in pet care (except veterinary) services, franchised businesses charge off at 10.4% vs 11.3% for independents — franchising is associated with 8% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Camp Run-A-Mutt franchisees

Celtic Bank Corporation3 loans100.0%
The Huntington National Bank2 loans—
Lincoln Savings Bank1 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 9 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
1
Loan volume
$372K
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
20

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Camp Run-A-Mutt from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
22.6%
Avg SBA guarantee
70%
Avg interest rate
8.60%
Avg chargeoff amount
$300K
Lender concentration
27.3%
Job velocity
3.0 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
4.6%
NAICS 812910
Jobs supported
160

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 27% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Celtic Bank Corporation3$1.6M100.0%
2The Huntington National Bank2$756KN/A
3Lincoln Savings Bank1$327K0.0%
4SouthState Bank, National Association1$500K100.0%
5Lendistry SBLC, LLC1$250K0.0%
6Truist Bank1$350K100.0%
7North State Bank1$1.1MN/A
8Byline Bank1$405KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
NVNevada20--
AZArizona11100.0%
CACalifornia100.0%
COColorado11100.0%
FLFlorida10--
GAGeorgia10--
IAIowa100.0%
NCNorth Carolina11100.0%
OHOhio10--
VAVirginia11100.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2017
1
2018
2
2019
5
2024
3

Borrower profile

Startup6 (60%)
Unanswered1 (10%)
Ownership change1 (10%)
New (< 2 yr)1 (10%)
Existing (2+ yr)1 (10%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offLimited · 14 loans
Verdict score49/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average49Verdict score 49/100
High confidence±6 pts
4355

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

One concluded case: CRAMER filed arbitration against franchisee KM CRAM Corp. (AAA Case No. 01-20-0005-0479) in April 2020 for unauthorized termination and opening competing business. Franchisee filed counterclaim and separate state court action. Settled November 2021 with franchisee stipulating to $450,000 claim in bankruptcy and nondischargeable judgment of $250,000, with settlement payments of $175,000-$200,000.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Kezos & Dunlavy, LLC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $0.9MYr 2: $0.9MNon-royalty: $0.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Total operating revenue for FY2022 of $930,066 comprises franchise sales $35,000, royalties $780,898, and ad fund fees $114,168. Audited statements of operations for years ended Dec 31, 2022/2021/2020. Financial statements show a going concern / stockholders' deficit. Auditor signed St. George, Utah, April 21, 2023.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 49 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDSystem contracting sharply: -7.7% YoY unit decline (12 units remaining) suggests deteriorating franchisee success and recruitment
  2. 02MEDNo disclosed net income despite $1.03M avg revenue—opacity around actual profitability raises concerns about franchisee ROI and sustainability
  3. 03HIGHLitigation history with fraud allegations: 2020-2021 arbitration involving breach, fraud claims, and rescission attempt indicates franchisor-franchisee conflict and potential business model disputes
  4. 04MINORHigh investment-to-revenue ratio: $588.9K-$1.14M startup cost against $1.03M avg revenue creates thin margin for franchisee profitability after 6% royalties and operating costs

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 157 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 7.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training60 hrs

Source: FDD 2024 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius5 mi
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ1 year
Non-compete (miles)ℹ25 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ5
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationSan Diego, California
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawState where franchise is located
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

One concluded case: CRAMER filed arbitration against franchisee KM CRAM Corp. (AAA Case No. 01-20-0005-0479) in April 2020 for unauthorized termination and opening competing business. Franchisee filed counterclaim and separate state court action. Settled November 2021 with franchisee stipulating to $450,000 claim in bankruptcy and nondischargeable judgment of $250,000, with settlement payments of $175,000-$200,000.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
29 hrs
On-the-job training
30 hrs
Training location
Corporate headquarters in San Diego, California; plus approximately 24 hours pre-opening at franchisee's Center
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
24 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Time to open
12 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee, subject to franchisor approval
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

16 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 16 contacts · $49
Free preview
(619) 312-••••
Unlock all 16 contacts
833-386-••••
(770) 686-••••
(832) 623-••••
435.656.••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Camp Run-A-Mutt franchise?

The total investment to open a Camp Run-A-Mutt franchise ranges from $589K – $1.1M, with an initial franchise fee of $40K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Camp Run-A-Mutt franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Camp Run-A-Mutt FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.0M. The median is $1.1M. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Camp Run-A-Mutt?

Camp Run-A-Mutt is franchised by Camp Run-A-Mutt Entrepreneurial Resources, Inc.. The FDD names no parent company. Source: FDD Item 1, 2024 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Camp Run-A-Mutt FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Camp Run-A-Mutt FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Camp Run-A-Mutt's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Camp Run-A-Mutt (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Camp Run-A-Mutt franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Camp Run-A-Mutt has 12 total units in the United States, including 12 franchised units and 0 company-owned units.

Is Camp Run-A-Mutt a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Camp Run-A-Mutt as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 49 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Camp Run-A-Mutt, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Education franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Education category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.